㈠ 求英语辩论稿
谁说合理？
㈡ 英语辩论稿：（竞争是一种有效的教与学的方法。）
Competition is a common phenomenon in our society . We compete when we play games, we try to do better than others in our study, and there is constant competition for jobs, fame, wealth and so forth. Therefore,we can say that, in a certain sense, competition is one of the motive forces of the development of our modern society.
It is often believed, that competition and cooperation are in opposition to each other. Some people stress competition, without which, in their eyes, there is no responsibility, no drive and ultimately, no progress. Others advocate cooperation whatever they do. They are of the opinion that the dependence of people on one another has increased, without which the society we live in can not keep going smoothly. In reality, we find that in many cases competition goes hand in hand with cooperation. Lets take a football game for example. During the game, one team is competing against the other, but each member of the team must cooperate with his teammates. Otherwise, they would lose the game no matter how skillful each indivial player might be. It is clear that competition has much to do with cooperation.
As far as I'm concerned, I do not agree with the view that competition and cooperation are always in conflict with each other. In my opinion, while advocating competition. We should never forget cooperation. In our social life, cooperation is especially necessary because most work is fulfilled with or through other people. So Ive come to the conclusion that competition are equally important.
仅供你参考。
㈢ 这样写英文辩论赛正方一辩的稿词
克隆利弊争论比较大的就是伦理问题
作为正方可以回避伦理问题，抓住治疗科研方面突破，攻击对方弱点，让其无还手之机。
To clone or not to clone, is that the question?
Advanced technology has already pushed human being to edges,such as the proction of weapons of mass destruction,the destruction of Ozone by Freon ,and the application of clone.The heated deabte over whether cloning technique should be used in human reproc--
tion must be considered as a serious issue.
Clone, to a certain degree, is beneficial to mankind.Such disease as Parkinsons will possiblly be cured in the future in the hope of further applying of clone.However,the abuse of this technology will bring human being unthinkable destruction.
Since the declaration of the death of Dolly,we are more conscious of the inefficient procere of clone.Acorrding to "Dolly's false legacy",the incidence of death among fetuses and offspring proced by cloning is much higher than it is through natural reproction--roughly 10 times as high as normal before birth and 3 times as high after birth.And even you may argue that this technology will be perfected in the future, i don't see there is any point in whole--being cloning.
Many people consider this technology a promising one as to bring all human being to a new era in which all human reproction will be accomplished by cloning.Thus scientists in some countries have already started their great plan to clone human.But let's think, what is the practical value in doing so?You may tell me that it can bring hope for those couples unable to have children because they might choose to have a of one of them rather than accept the gene intrusion from a doner.But imagine,if you have a child owning the same apperance as yours or your husband's, will you accept it without any uncomfort?
Don't you think it is embarrassing?Or if this kind of human reproction is allowed,terrorists may get hold of it and reproce lots of "American Presidents".Don't you agree that these presidents might bring the world much more chaoes?Besides these terrible aspects,the cloning of whole--being may destroy the diversity of people of the globe.
再有
1． 克隆技术与遗传育种
在农业方面，人们利用“克隆”技术培育出大量具有抗旱、抗倒伏、抗病虫害的优质高产品种，大大提高了粮食产量。在这方面我国已迈入世界最先进的前列。
2． 克隆技术与濒危生物保护
克隆技术对保护物种特别是珍稀、濒危物种来讲是一个福音，具有很大的应用前景。从生物学的角度看，这也是克隆技术最有价值的地方之一。
3． 克隆技术与医学
在当代，医生几乎能在所有人类器官和组织上施行移植手术。但就科学技术而言，器官移植中的排斥反应仍是最为头痛的事。排斥反应的原因是组织不配型导致相容性差。如果把“克隆人”的器官提供给“原版人”，作器官移植之用，则绝对没有排斥反应之虑，因为二者基因相配，组织也相配。问题是，利用“克隆人”作为器官供体合不合乎人道？是否合法？经济是否合算？
克隆技术还可用来大量繁殖有价值的基因，例如，在医学方面，人们正是通过“克隆”技术生产出治疗糖尿病的胰岛素、使侏儒症患者重新长高的生长激素和能抗多种病毒感染的干挠素，等等。
㈣ 急求一篇英语辩论稿！
如何提高英语成绩
一、怎样提高阅读?
多读,精泛结合,
把握读的方法,使用浏览,查读,寻读,对不同文体采用不同的方法,就好比驾驶员开车要用不同的速度一样,
学会揣词,分析长句\难句,抓住句子主干或关键词,善于找主题句,知道常见的问题怎么出:
这样就能在有限时间积累并运用。
3.同义词完形、单选中都有，其实都在考具体上下文语境，既然你的 “语感和理解能力勉强还可以”，那就充分发挥你的语感，你能否试试不看完形的选项能直接作对8－10空呢？我较我的学生训练时，就是不给选项，开始有的只能填对1－2空，后来慢慢地增加到5－10 甚至更多，完形还要特别注意下文提示上文的地方，有的要到下文10几行后采提示，作后一定要复核一遍。这样训练50篇左右就可以将它提高到20分以上哦！^_^
4.书面表达建议背50篇范文,不是新概念3,而是学生优秀作文,在仔细研究每中文体的写法和每一篇的优秀句子.看一看我怎么写,人家有怎么写......再自己坚持每周写一篇.
5.单选最好作一本错题本:把每次作业及考试的易错题归类整理,并表明出错原因,以便下次避免在犯同样错误.
二、怎样学习词汇
词汇是语言的基本组成成分，要培养语言交际技能，就必须掌握一定的词汇量。同时，词汇是英语学习的基础，词汇量的多少是衡量英语水平高低最基本的标准之一。因此，词汇学习在语言教学中始终占有举足轻重的地位。
怎样才能快速提高英语成绩
首先，要学好英语，最关键的是要有兴趣。俗话说：兴趣是最好的老师。教我们英语的是一位 年轻的老师，他讲课很风趣，还总是让我们自己上台讲课，演小品。生动的英语教学，让我对英语产生了浓厚的兴趣。光有兴趣还不行，我们还得知道如何去学。
对很多同学来说背单词无疑是件很痛苦的事了。我在背单词时，不是按照单词书上的一个一个背下来，这样很容易让人产生厌倦心理，而且很容易忘。我是在每一页抽几个背，就是很随机的。在平时，我们可以制作一些小卡片，把很难记的写在上面，一有空就那出来看一下，或者可以在床头放一些卡片，每天睡觉前看几眼。更有效的就是在睡前和寝室的同学进行猜字竞赛。每次大家互相把当天学的单词猜一遍，这样就记的牢了。当然背单词最重要的是要不间断的进行温习。
三、怎样提高口语水平？
一般来说，衡量一个人口语水平高低主要看以下几个方面：
1．语音、语调是否正确，口齿是否清楚；
2．流利程度；
3．语法是否正确，用词是否恰当，是否符合英语表达习惯；
4．内容是否充实，逻辑是否清楚。
这些是衡量会话能力的主要标准。针对以上标准，采取相应的训练方法，大致可分作两个阶段。
第一阶段：准备阶段，主要是进行模仿。背诵。复述练习。目的是训练正确的语音。语调。提高流利程度，培养英语语感。同时，通过各种方式，如阅读。做练习题，听英语磁带，看英语录像和电影等，来扩大词汇量。掌握英语的习惯表达方式，扩大知识面和训练英语逻辑思维能力，准备会话前，要对常用的词(组)、短语等熟练掌握，“熟练”是与人会话的前提，只有熟练，在会话时才能流利。熟练的标准就是要达到不假思索地脱口而出。
第二阶段：实践阶段，主要进行大量的会话练习，与他人对话、讨论，基础好的可练习口译，自己讲英语故事等等。
㈤ 用英语写一篇英语辩论赛的欢迎稿
克隆利弊争论比较大的就是伦理问题
作为正方可以回避伦理问题，抓住治疗科研方面突破，攻击对方弱点，让其无还手之机。
To clone or not to clone, is that the question?
Advanced technology has already pushed human being to edges,such as the proction of weapons of mass destruction,the destruction of Ozone by Freon ,and the application of clone.The heated deabte over whether cloning technique should be used in human reproc--
tion must be considered as a serious issue.
Clone, to a certain degree, is beneficial to mankind.Such disease as Parkinsons will possiblly be cured in the future in the hope of further applying of clone.However,the abuse of this technology will bring human being unthinkable destruction.
Since the declaration of the death of Dolly,we are more conscious of the inefficient procere of clone.Acorrding to "Dolly's false legacy",the incidence of death among fetuses and offspring proced by cloning is much higher than it is through natural reproction--roughly 10 times as high as normal before birth and 3 times as high after birth.And even you may argue that this technology will be perfected in the future, i don't see there is any point in whole--being cloning.
Many people consider this technology a promising one as to bring all human being to a new era in which all human reproction will be accomplished by cloning.Thus scientists in some countries have already started their great plan to clone human.But let's think, what is the practical value in doing so?You may tell me that it can bring hope for those couples unable to have children because they might choose to have a of one of them rather than accept the gene intrusion from a doner.But imagine,if you have a child owning the same apperance as yours or your husband's, will you accept it without any uncomfort?
Don't you think it is embarrassing?Or if this kind of human reproction is allowed,terrorists may get hold of it and reproce lots of "American Presidents".Don't you agree that these presidents might bring the world much more chaoes?Besides these terrible aspects,the cloning of whole--being may destroy the diversity of people of the globe.
㈥ 英语辩论发言稿
Almost everybody assumes that Chinese religion is polytheist in nature. My question is: where did this sort of religion come from? How did it originate? As for the origin of religion in general, there have been two opposite theoretical explanations. The first is a quite prevailing one, as represented by such giant thinkers as Herbert Spencer, Burnet Taylor, George Frazer, etc. According to them, religions have been developed evolutionally in a progressive way, i.e., from the pre-or/and simi-religions in the pre-historical time, to the polytheism in most ancient civilizations, and lastly, to the monotheism only in Judaism, Christianity and Islamism. On the other side, William Schmidt and others represent an opposite theory. They attempted to prove that the developing line of religion is not progressive, but degenerate from a primary monotheism in the process of cultural diffusion to varieties of polytheism, and even lower forms of superstition.
A key point of their disagreement concerns the objects of religious worship. According to the progressive theory, the low, manifold and complex worship objects converged upon the simple, unified and higher ones, and finally, upon the ultimate reality pointing to a unique, supreme God. The degenerate theory assumed an opposite direction of divergence, starting with the supreme God and ending with the lowest sort of religions.
The debate between the two theories has taken place since the second half of the 19th century. Due to the limit of knowledge and interest, both sides could hardly take account of Chinese religion in the ancient time. Western scholars took it for granted that the Chinese religion is a form of polytheism, and originated from totem worship, animism and magic rituals, as they had seen in other primitive cultures.
Since this century many new discoveries and interpretations have been made in the fields of archaeology, anthropology, sociology, history, linguistics and cross-cultural studies. These enable us to rethink the origin and development of the Chinese religion in the context of the unsolved debate between progressive and degenerate theories.
The chronology of the Chinese religion can be divided into 3 stages: the primary religion in the pre-historical time, the primary system of polytheism in the Shang and Chou Dynasties, and the proliferated forms of polytheism from Chin Dynasty to the present time. We know little about the primary religion and focus ourselves on the religion in the Shang and Chou Dynasties.
According to my analysis, the polytheistic system in that time manifested a hierarchy of objects of worship, from the highest, supreme God, to the ancestral spirits, and then to the natural spirits and the lowest spirits of ordinary life.
Based on the exegesis of oracle bone inscriptions in the Shang time and classics in the pre-Chin time, my paper is intended to prove the thesis that it is unlikely that the polytheism in the Shang and Chou time resulted from a converging progress from more primitive and lower worships. That religious system was constructed and functioned downwards from above, rather than upwards from below.
I dare to present arguments for the above thesis as follows.
I. It is unlikely that the supreme God was proced by Shang people as a result of the convergence from their images of ancestral spirits.
1) The Shang people didn’t have the idea that God had a blood relationship with their ancestors. Their relationship was rather conceived as the host-guest relation.
2) God did not communicate with people directly, but only indirectly through the mediation of their ancestors.
3) God was conceived as the source of life and the originator of mankind, yet without sexual behavior and natural birth. This perplexity led to the myth of the sympathetic birth in almost all ancient societies.
4) God was not proced as a result of the abstraction from the total image of their ancestors. This can be shown by the ritual order, in which the rites for the God was strictly distinguished from, and higher than the rites for the totality of ancestors.
II. It is unlikely that the God was proced as a result of a converging development from natural spirits.
1) Natural spirits were the personal images of the minister-ancestors. It is illogical to conceive them as the image of God who is higher than the king-ancestors.
2) The God named as Ti in the Shang time, and was neither the God of heaven, nor a natural God. He was identical with the Heaven (Tian) only later in the Chou time.
3) The shift from Ti to Tian can be explained in terms of moralization from a humanistic perspective, but also in terms of a degeneration of religious faith and feeling from a theological (not necessarily Christian) perspective. The tendency of degeneration continued in and after the pre-Chin time and led to a naturalistic attitude towards Heaven.
III. Ancestral spirits were not worshiped as a result of the converging development of animism and totem.
1) Ancestral spirits were dead persons with both spirit and body. Therefore no difference between spirit and ghost existed in that time. Those personal spirits and ghosts are not the same as souls in the animism that Taylor proposed.
2) Ancestral spirits were not developed from totem worship. According to my own interpretation, a totem is a symbol used for the classification of blood ties and the identity of a clan. When the totem symbols were changed into name ring the time of the beginning of a primitive language, especially in the process of the origin of the pictorial language of the chinese, the symbolized animals were confused with the first ancestor of the clan.
3) The transformation from totem worship to ancestral worship can be understood better as the mythical origin, caused by a certain “linguistic disease” (in the words of Max Müller). .
VI. The divination in the Shang and Chou time cannot be interpreted by Frazer’s theory of magic in terms of shamanism.
1) Divination was used as a necessary means to communicate with the God after a religious reform in the pre-historical time, which broke the Heaven-Earth link.
2) The diviner (wu) is not the same as a magician. The role assigned to the wu was to serve as mediator in communication. He was only able to pass the divine prediction without any power to change it, much less affect or even control God by his magic power.
3) The wu has to show the great piety and respect for the God in order to receive the divine information. Divination was practiced as a part and an effect of the divine worship, and cannot be prior to the notion of an omniscient God.
参考资料：http://162.105.161.68/forum/viewtopic.php?t=60
㈦ 写一篇英语辩论稿，70词左右就行了 帮帮忙，急！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！
正方： of your favorite items is a personal hobbies, the performance of an indivial seeking to enhance the love of life, a strong-minded people. At the same time, collection of items is likely to become in a few years later, precious relics and historical value.
反方：Collection of items too loving not only a waste of money, but also affect the normal life and quality of life. There was even items for collection at your favorite daughter. This is the favorite for the obsession with change is absolutely undesirable.
㈧ 急需一篇英语辩论稿
是写环保的么？如果是，可以参考我给你写的。
以下这些可以给你作为立论的。
在环境保护已经成为全球最热门话题的今天，不论是国家政府，还是企业以及个人，都已经把环保事业重视起来。然而我们不得不承认，社会和生活是很现实的，没有足够的资金，有太多的事业都很难有效的进行，不幸的是，这其中也包括环保。环保治污是一项非常需要高新技术以及高新人才的事业，如果没有这些，不但治污的效果达不到，而且可能会在治理一项污染的过程中产生另一项污染。这样的话，我们为环保所付出的努力就变得毫无意义了。而对于政府及企业来说，如果想要引进高新技术及人才，资金是必不可少的。因此只有有了钱，我们才能更好的进行环保事业，从而使我们的环境变得更好。
Nowadays, environmental protection has become the hotest topic all around the globe, to which not only the governments, but also enterprises and indivials have payed their great attention. However, we have to admit that we are living in a realistic society, and there are too many goals that we're not able to achieve effectively without enough funds, in which, unfortunately, environmental protection is included. Environmental protection & pullution controlling is an undertaking with high requirements for high-tech and top talents. Without these supports, the proccess of one pollution control may not only be effectiveless, but also become the cause of another pollution. In this case, the efforts we have taken for environmental protection would become senseless. Moreover, it's essential to have enough money for govenments and enterprises to bring in hi-technologies and top talents. As a result, it's necessary to have enough money in order to carry out the undertakings of environmental protection, which is, to make good changes to our environment.
以上是我手创的，就算你去大学英语辩论会也绝对站得住脚了。应该对你有用。
另外给你提供一个论据，是我国一家环保企业--中国博奇环保科技最近在东证（世界第二大证券交易市场）上市的成功案例，它从侧面反映了拥有雄厚的财力对于推行环保事业有多么重要。以下是相关新闻资料
http://china.nikkei.co.jp/china/news/intv/intv200710220120.html
如果需要修改或扩充上面的那段立论。
㈨ 英语辩论稿
Should Yuanmingyuan Be Built?
Yuanmingyuan, Garden of all gardens, was burnt down in 1860. Recently my classmates had a discussion about whether it should be rebuilt or not.
Some of them strongly support the idea of rebuilding with various persuasive reasons. To reconstruct it, we can be thoroughly intoxicated in its vast magnificence as well as fully present the splendor of Chinese culture. And definitely, it will become an inviting landscape to attract an increasing number of visitors. Or even if we merely partly rebuild it, people who come here will still deeply remember the humiliation of the past when compared it to the ruins beside it.
While others are still strongly against it, thinking it is fairly reasonable to leave it as what it was to warn every visitors not to forget the past. Besides, other cultural relics such as the Palace Museum and the Summer Palace have already fulfilled the task of illustrating Chinese culture, so it is not necessary to rebuild it. And taken the environment into consideration, the rebuilding project is really detrimental to the eco-system.