1. 英语口语辩论呀
1 经验是用时间来积累，可以帮我们快速做出第一反应。have a rapid reaction
2经验能锻炼我们的综合版实力，提高各种权能力。improve actually ability.
3积累更多的经验，是生活中的一笔财富。experience means corns.
2. 急急急！！！求人帮忙写下英语辩论的双人对话，口语考试用，
2.汽车的弊大于利
世界上任何事物均具两面性，人类的聪明处在于趋利避害，尽可能利用和扩大其有利的方面，回避和缩小其不利之处。当前人们对待汽车时态度亦如此。
The world everything has two sides, human wisdom is that draw on the advantages and avoid disadvantages, as far as possible the use of and expand its positive aspects, avoid and rece its disadvantages. At present people treat vehicleattitude also so.
汽车的问世和发展，极大地方便了人类的活动，有人说它无异是缩小了地球，延长了人的生命。不过汽车在造福于人类的同时，也带来了祸害，而且这种祸害日益严重，因此又有人称它为“城市杀手”。
The advent and development of automotive, greatly facilitates human activities,some people say it is down to earth, extend the life of the people. But the car for the benefit of mankind at the same time, also brought harm, and the harm is becoming more and more serious, so it is also called "city killer".
由汽车引起的交通事故每年吞噬数十万人的性命。据记载，汽车于1896年撞死了第一名行人。两年之后，即1898年，第一名司机在交通事故中丧生。从那时以来，汽车已经“杀死”3000多万人。特别是90年代开始，死于汽车交通事故的人数急剧增加，平均每年达50多万。这个数字超过艾滋病、战争和结核病人年死亡数，仅少于忧郁症和心脏病人年死亡数。
The car caused by traffic accidents every year hundreds of thousands of livesphagocytosis. According to the record, the car in 1896 killed a pedestrian. Two years later, in 1898, the first driver died in the traffic accident. Since then, the carhas "killed" about 30000000. Especially in the beginning of the 90's, people died intraffic accidents has increased dramatically, the average of about 500000 a year.This figure more than AIDS, tuberculosis patient years war and death, only less than depression and heart disease death number.
由于发展中国家汽车破旧，路况差，管理不严，司机和行人缺乏交通知识，加上发生事故后抢救不及时，因此交通事故死亡人数大大高于发达国家，占世界交通事故死亡总人数的70％以上。
Due to the developing automobile old, poor road conditions, lax management,driver and pedestrian traffic accident, lack of knowledge, plus the rescue is not timely, so the traffic accident death toll is much higher than that of developedcountries, the total number of death in the world of traffic accident
More than 70%.
汽车排出的尾气严重威胁人类健康。如今世界上许多大城市的空气都已严重污染，汽车排出的尾气是最大的污染源之一。空气污染加剧了哮喘，支气管炎、肺癌以及各种心血管疾病的发作，甚至置人于死命。据统计，墨西哥城每年有1．25万人死于空气污染造成的呼吸系统疾病；以交通阻塞闻名于世的曼谷城，污浊的空气中含有38种细菌和真茵，它们导致人们腹泻、血液中毒和患脑膜炎。泰国研究人员的报告指出，正是这种空气污染使他们的人均寿命比日本，美国等国少了十六七岁，俄罗斯汽车排放的有害物质比美欧国家高39倍。从1993年至1997年，由于空气污染使莫斯科新生畸形儿童增加30％，儿童血液病增加50％。
Vehicle exhaust serious threat to human health. Now many big city in the world hasthe serious pollution of air, vehicle exhaust is the biggest source of pollution. Air pollution exacerbated asthma, bronchitis, lung cancer and onset of cardiovascular disease, even the man. According to statistics, there are 12500 people die fromrespiratory diseases caused by air pollution in Mexico city each year to traffic congestion; world-famous Bangkok city, dirty air contains 38 kinds of bacteria andfungi, which leads to diarrhea, blood poisoning and meningitis. The Thailand researchers report points out, it is the air pollution so that the average life expectancy than Japan, countries such as USA sixteen less seven years, Russianvehicle emissions of harmful substances is 39 times higher than the US and European countries. From 1993 to 1997, because of the air pollution that Moscowneonatal deformity children increased 30%, 50% increase in children with hematological diseases.
汽车造成的噪音也危害人类。专家们说，人的听觉可接受的合适音量为30分贝。但现在不少城市车辆造成的噪音在70分贝以上，有些城市如开罗市中心的噪音甚至达到90分贝。这不仅会引起耳聋，还会造成神经系统紊乱和心脏病等。
The automobile caused noise is harmful to human. Experts say, the appropriatevolume of human auditory acceptable was 30 db. But now many city vehicles causenoise at 70 dB above, some city such as Cairo city noise even up to 90 db. This will not only cause deafness, still can cause disorders of the nervous system and heart disease.
所以 我认为汽车的存在弊大于利
So I think the existence of the automobile does more harm than good
3. 英语口语和书面语哪个重要 明天就是英语辩论会了,请高人讲解!（尽量详细一些）
如果在高中阶段的话,还是书面语重要,因为高中阶段英语都是以考试为主,口语牵扯的很少
4. 辩论赛（在英语学习中，写作重要还是口语重要）
辩论的时候，尤其是在提问环节一定要把住一点：写作不是书写，写作是指正式书面语言的能力，不是那种只会写英文但是一点都不会说的，跟哑巴英语不完全是一个概念。如果对方指出任何关于不能说英语的论点论据，一定要当场指出对方是在偷换概念，“那么按照对方辩友所说的认为写作重要就是完全不具备英语口头表达的能力，是不是就意味着你们认为学习英语口语比较重要指的是只会说英语而完全不认识英语单词的英文白丁呢”。如果对方承认，那你们就赢了，因为只要会写，就能通过电脑手机和纸笔等媒介进行交流，可以取得跟口头交流一样的功效虽然只是慢一点，但是如果只会说英语但是单词一概不认识，那么除了口头沟通以外没有其他作用了，英语书也看不懂，就算口语能上天，出国走在大街上连路牌都看不懂，更不用提官方场合、书信往来或者正式合同了。不识字的人出国留学或者找工作都是不可能的。
在这个基本前提之下，我们的观点：
1.书面表达虽然有的时候繁琐一些，在生活当中运用起来显得过于正式，但是依然可以起到正常交流的作用。就算说起来不像注重口语表达那样流利或者不能表达的那么合适，依然可以发挥功能。
2.先重点学习写作可以使作为第二或者第三语言学习的人打好语法基础，这样在学好了学做的基础之上再学习口语就会容易很多。如果相反，先重点学习口语，极容易导致学不好写作，因为英语口语是很随意的，一旦口语的模式先入为主，很容易忽略今后写作中出现的错误，导致学不好这门语言。（在这一点上可以找一些实际的论据，很多母语为英语的人经常在书面表达中出现语法错误，所以如果你留过学就会知道，写论文的时候语法是作业要求中的一项，这一项不是为了外国人准备的，而是很多本地人的语法也不严谨）
另外还有一点，就是我们所讨论的写作和口语都是以第一人称表达的能力，不是接受感知的能力，所以默认的环境是对于听力的能力是一样的。比如如果对方说看美剧什么的，这个根本不在我们的讨论范围之内，因为看美剧需要的是听力，你不需要跟屏幕交流。
5. 急需英语口语辩论翻译~~~请进~~~
watching TV，以下的可以参考：）~~
TV is still a major access to the outside world, an effective medium for knowledge learning, a valuable chance to experience society harmlessly, and an easy way to relax. I prefer watching TV to reading books, for I think watching requires less effort. Moving pictures appear to be more impressive as well.
Studies by experts have clearly shown us that the programme of featuring violence will surely cast an ill effect on the behavior of children,who are too young to distinguish virtue from evil,and consequently will act violence out in reality.
As a result,the report of juvenile delinquenxy are not uncommon.
Unless proper action can be taken in time to regulate the current problem,our socity will be left a world of violence.
It is evil, because it has exposed people, especially inexperienced youngsters, directly to all kinds of ugliness. As the TV instry develops, TV screens begin to be filled with pornography,violence and nonsense. Bad programs and ugly language seriously influence televiewers.
6. 英语辩论 学英语口语重要还是笔试重要
我觉得当然是口语比较重要，要沟通当然是口语咯，用写作多少慢啊。现在外面有回很多的英语培训机构都是培答训学员的口语能力，出去找工作最先主要的也是培训口语能力的。我现在就在中山公园的昂立新动态国际英语学习口语，环境也很好，老师教的也很好的。而写作，有了一定的基础之后就可以写了呀。所以还是口语比较重要。
7. 英语口语重要英文辩论稿，给例子即可谢咯！
亲。。你把上面的换一下就好了嘛 - -不过上面的有点点错误。。额 修改下。比方这样的：
Grammar is important, but when it compares withs poken language, it is the root and leaves, spoken english is the root. By saying so, I don't mean tha we don't have to learn grammar,but first of all,we should have the root, that this to say practical ability is more important. nowadays, the society is a communicative one. people need to communicate with each other. when we talk with someone, what matters is that if you express yourselves well or not, but not if you are right in gramar or not.
8. 英语口语辩论赛有用句型
你这个题目很宽泛。。有个英语辩论赛技巧的帖子，希望能对你有用 On Debating Clarity: Avoise of terms which can be interpreted differently by different readers.When we are talking to people who substantially agree with us we canuse such terms as "rednecks" or "liberals" and feel reasonably surethat we will be understood. But in a debate, we are talking to peoplewho substantially disagree with us and they are likely to put adifferent interpretation on such words. Evidence:Quoting an authority is not evidence. Quoting a majority opinion is notevidence. Any argument that starts with, "According to Einstein..." isnot based on objective evidence. Any argument that starts with, "Mostbiologists believe..." is not based on objective evidence. Saying, "TheBible says..." is not evidence. Authorities and majorities can be wrongand frequently have been. （历届辩论赛中出现最多的问题） Emotionalism: Avoidemotionally charged words--words that are likely to proce more heatthan light. Certainly the racial, ethnic, or religious hate words haveno place in rational debating. Likewise, avoid argumentum ad hominem.Personal attacks on your opponent are an admission of intellectualbankruptcy. Also, slurs directed at groups with whom your opponent isidentified are usually nonproctive. Try to keep attention centered onthe objective problem itself. There is a special problem when debatingsocial, psychological, political, or religious ideas because a person'stheories about these matters presumably have some effect on his ownlife style. In other words, rather than saying "and that's why you aresuch an undisciplined wreck" say, "a person adopting your position is,I believe, likely to become an undisciplined wreck because ..." Causality: Avoid the blunder of asserting a causal relationship with the popular fallacy of post hoc ergo propter hocwhich declares that because some event A happened and immediatelyafterward event B happened that event A was the cause of event B.(Iknew someone whose car stalled on the way to work. She would get outand open the hood and slam it and then the car would start. Singing asong would have been just as effective to allow time for a vapor lockto dissipate!) Also avoid the popular fallacy that correlation provescausation. People who own Cadillacs, on average, have higher incomesthan people who don't. This does not mean that if we provided peoplewith Cadillacs that they would have higher incomes. Innuendo(影射):Innuendois saying something pejorative about your opponent without coming rightout and saying it but by making more or less veiled allusions to somecircumstance, rumor, or popular belief. If you want to see someexcellent examples of innuendo, watch Rush Limbaugh. Politicians are,unfortunately, frequently guilty of using innuendo. It is an easy wayto capitalize on popular prejudices without having to make explicitstatements which might be difficult or impossible to defend againstrational attack. Besure of your facts. What is the source of your information? If it is anewspaper or a magazine, are you sure that the information hasn't been"slanted" to agree with that publication's political bias? Wherecrucial facts are concerned, it is best to check with more than onesource. Often international publications will give you a differentperspective than your hometown newspaper. Check to see whether the bookyou are using was published by a regular publishing company or whetherit was published by some special interest group like the John BirchSociety or a religious organization. These books cannot be trusted topresent unbiased evidence since their motivation for publishing is nottruth but rather the furtherance of some political or religious view. Understandyour opponents' arguments. It is good practice to argue with a friendand take a position with which you do not agree. In this way you maydiscover some of the assumptions your opponents are making which willhelp you in the debate. Remember that everybody thinks that hisposition is the right one, and everybody has his reasons for thinkingso. Do not impute ridiculous or malevolent ideas to your opponent. An example of this is the rhetorical statement, "Haveyou stopped beating your wife?" This imputes or presupposes that youropponent has beaten his wife. One frequently sees references byconservative speakers and writers to the idea that gay activists want"special privileges." This would be ridiculous if it were true. Itisn't true, but speaking as if it were true and well known to all isegregiously unfair to listeners or readers who may not be wellinformed. It is probably always wise to treat your opponent withrespect, even if he doesn't deserve it. If he doesn't deserve respect,this will probably soon become obvious enough. Regression to the mean(逻辑退化):Another source of error which occurs very frequently is the failure totake into account regression to the mean. This is a bit technical, butit is very important, especially in any kind of social or psychologicalresearch which depends upon statistical surveys or even experimentswhich involve statistical sampling. Rather than a general statement ofthe principle (which becomes more and more unintelligible as thestatement becomes more and more rigorous) an example will be used. Let's consider intelligence testing. 1.Perhaps we have a drug that is supposed to raise the IQ of mentallyretarded kids. So we give a thousand intelligence tests and select the30 lowest scoring indivials. 2. We then give these low scoring kids our drug and test them again. 3. We find that there has been an increase in the average of their IQ scores. 4. Is this evidence that the drug increased the IQ? Notnecessarily! Suppose we want to show that smoking marijuana lowers theIQ. Well, we take the 30 highest scoring kids in our sample and givethem THC and test them again. We find a lower average IQ. Is this evidence that marijuana lowers the IQ? Notnecessarily! Any statistician knows that if you make some kind of ameasurement of some attribute of a large sample of people and thenselect the highest and lowest scoring indivials and make the samemeasurement again, the high scoring group will have a lower averagescore and the low scoring group will have a higher average score thanthey did the first time. This is called "regression to the mean" and itis a perfectly universal statistical principle. Thereare undoubtedly more points to be made here. Suggestions will begratefully received. Larry has made the following suggestions: · Apply the scientific method. （运用科学方法） · Cite relevant personal experience. （合理引用相关的个人经历） · Be polite. （辩论过程中有礼待人） · Organize your response. (Beginning, middle, end.) （对你辩词进行合理的组织） · Treat people as indivials. · Cite sources for statistics and studies used. · Literacy works. Break posts into sentences and paragraphs. · Read the post you are responding to. Stay open to learning
9. 如何进行模拟辩论英语口语教学
口语是写作的基础，就像一个幼年孩子，总是在模仿他人的口型说话，然版后慢慢掌握一权种语言的技巧，继而学会写作，我认为，写作时语言的升华与深入，而口语是语言的基础与引领，英语作为大多数人的第二母语，应该是先学会口语然后写作
10. 英语口语辩论话题
Computers to students is good or bad (电脑对学生是好是坏 )
答！ Some good and some bad （有好也有坏）