2013考研英语一阅读4

㈠ 2013年考研英语一阅读新题型答案

英语卷子有很多套，就是所谓的一题多卷，完型、阅读、新题型都是的
就是题目是一样专的但是选属项的顺序不一样，可能你的A项在我的卷子上是D项，就是为了防止作弊
所以网上的卷子只是某一个版本
不信你打开不同机构提供的真题卷子对比一下就知道了

㈡ 急问，2013考研英语一难度

个人英语四级593，六级490，都是一次考过的，虽然考研和四六级不一样，但至少可以专说明我英语还算属可以的，但这次我的英语阅读至少错了8个，新题型十几分钟做完对了一个，翻译我直接写不出来。作文算是适中，我也没有背模板。这次我只祈求过线就行了。

㈢ 求助 关于考研英语一真题2013年text4

Text 4
a five to three vote,the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona's immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Aministration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the federal government and the states.
An arizona.United States,the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona's controversial plan to have state and local police enfour federal immigrations law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to "establish a uniform Rule of Anturalization" and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial.Arizona had attempted to fashion state police that ran to the existing federal ones.
Justice Anthony Kennedy,joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court's liberals,ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun .On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately "occupied the field " and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal's privileged powers
However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.
Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute. The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.
The 8-0 objection to President Obama tures on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as “a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”. The White House argued tha Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities, even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter. In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with.
Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government,and control of citizenship and the borders is among them. But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status,it could.It could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn't want to carry out Congress's immigration wishes,no state should be allowed to do so either.Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim.
36. Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because they
[A] deprived the federal police of Constitutional powers.
[B] disturbed the power balance between different states.
[C] overstepped the authority of federal immigration law.
[D] contradicted both the federal and state policies.
37. On which of the following did the Justices agree,according to Paragraph4?
[A] Federal officers’ ty to withhold immigrants’information.
[B] States’ independence from federal immigration law.
[C] States’ legitimate role in immigration enforcement.
[D] Congress’s intervention in immigration enforcement.
38. It can be inferred from Paragraph 5 that the Alien and Sedition Acts
[A] violated the Constitution.
[B] undermined the states’ interests.
[C] supported the federal statute.
[D] stood in favor of the states.
39. The White House claims that its power of enforcement
[A] outweighs that held by the states.
[B] is dependent on the states’ support.
[C] is established by federal statutes.
[D] rarely goes against state laws.
40. What can be learned from the last paragraph?
[A] Immigration issues are usually decided by Congress.
[B] Justices intended to check the power of the Administrstion.
[C] Justices wanted to strengthen its coordination with Congress.
[D] The Administration is dominant over immigration issues.

㈣ 2013年考研英语英一阅读部分难度系数多少

不清楚，应该是最高的，分享个视频
2014 考研英语一阅读分析（一）文章来源版
http://my.tv.sohu.com/us/231057940/74386390.shtml
2014 考研英语一阅读分权析（二）获得信息

㈤ 2013考研英语一难度如何

这个问题可以说是因人而异，大部分人认为考研难在单词量和语法，其实，这不是单词量和语法的问题。对于过了专八，和六级拿高分的同学来说，单词量和语法早已不是问题。专八单词12000个，考研5500个，六级5000个。而语法，只要高中读完，就几乎再没有新的语法了。至于熟词僻意，在考研中的确有，但只占少数，对于考生的威胁也不形成气候。

考研英语真正的难点在于陷阱!

这在四六级，专四专八中是几乎绝迹的。但是考研的客观题，即，完型，阅读，新题型中都充斥着陷阱。比如，阅读中：偷换概念，以偏概全，无中生有，扩大范围等等。

在此，浅谈一下完型。出题者在完形中，使过的一类最简单的小猫腻。

例如：在08年的11题中，(注意：请读者先看一个选项，判断它的意思，然后再往下读)选项D.
unaccountably。很多考生把这个单词理解为：无数的。结果带入特别通顺，结果答错，失分。殊不知，上了出题者的当，这个单词应该是：无法解释地。注意此词的词根为：account
作为动词表示：解释，而不是count 作为动词表示，数数。这是高中词汇表中的一个单词。在此处，出题者就指望考生把这个单词看错为：无数的，然后带回去答错。

此处是完型干扰项的一种设置：称作：词形干扰。说白了就是障眼法。

最近十年类似明显的障眼法还有三处，分别是：

02年的38题，选项D. effected。这是一个根本不存在的单词，注意effect是名词，affect是其动词形式，其后才能加ed。

03年的31题，选项C. personnel，有人误读为：私人的，实为：人事的;

同样03年的31题，选项D. corporation，有人误读为：合作，实为：公司;

异常巧妙的是：如果选项C. personnel 误认为：私人的，即与该题选项B. indivial，个人的，形成近义词辨析;而如果选项D.
corporation误读为合作，即与该题选项A.
group，群体的，形成近义词辨析。出题者的干扰项设置可不是没有道理的、任意的，此处，03年的出题者可谓把词形辨析玩到了极致!

由此可见，如果考生们不知考研英语本质(陷阱)的话，可能这个瓶颈就很难逾越。因此，考生如果一个劲只顾复习而不好好分析的话，很有可能就是在南辕北辙。

㈥ 2013年考研英语阅读加新题型错十个，完型拿4分，翻译没戏估计拿多少分。

完型减去16分，翻译减去15分，错10个减去20分，这样的话，49分。

也许不对。

㈦ 请问谁有2003年到2013年考研英语的阅读和阅读译文真题啊~紧急求啊。

http://wenku..com/link?url=5XPuc1nZO1iVqqLxZVQuTMGqO_SVbOMUSwq&rt=1&rt=1

㈧ 考研英语的4篇阅读难度有差别吗

没有什么差别。
考核的东西不一样，所以对不同的人有不同的难度感受了。

㈨ 2013年英语一阅读text4是不是太难了点儿

2013年英复语一阅读text4确实是非常难制了。

每年考试过后8月份或9月份公布成绩并颁发成绩单，根据教育部规定四六级考试不设置及格线，四级425分（含425分）以上可以报考六级，所以大家普遍认为四六级的合格线为425分。

英语四六级的分数是排位分，没有总分。报名时间CET全国英语四六级考试的考试时间为：每年6月份、12月份（每年时间略有不同）。

2019年1月15日，中国教育部考试中心与英国文化教育协会在京联合发布雅思、普思考试与中国英语能力等级量表对接研究结果。雅思听力得5分，即达到中国英语能力等级量表四级水平。

㈩ 考研英语阅读13年真题阅读错了四个 14年错了12个 怎么办太不稳定了

接着做，做到稳定为止。
你是不是背景知识偏科啊？整理一下哪些背景的文章容易做错，相应的补充一下。