14考研英语2阅读翻译

⑴ 求考研英语二阅读理解全文翻译

其实，去买一本张剑的黄宝书，蛮不错的，不仅有翻译，还可以珍藏。。。
个人不是做广告，与其在网上找资料打印，不如去买一本。。。

⑵ 考研英语翻译看谁的，英语二的

英二的话，用一本《考研圣经》就能搞定翻译！它的真题解析一词一句讲解，不仅适合英回语基础薄弱的我，还答帮我巩固了句子语法。尤其翻译题还有升级版的译文，一步一步教怎么写好翻译，结合真题更有效果，性价比很高的真题书没错了！

⑶ 考研英语阅读及翻译题的来源

一、年考研英语文章出处 摘选自《2011年考研英语大逆转》
1.完形填空 纽约时报（The New York Times） The Cost of Smarts
www.nytimes.com/2008/05/07/opinion/07wed4.html
2.阅读第一篇 纽约时报（The New York Times） Can You Become a Creature of New Habits？
www.nytimes.com/2008/05/07/opinion/07wed4.html
3.阅读第二篇 科学美国人（Scientific American） Who’’s Your Daddy？ The Answer May Be at the Drugstore
www.sciam.com/article.cfm？id=who-is-your-daddy-the-answer-may-be-at-the-drugstore
4.阅读第三篇 麦肯锡季刊（The Mckinsey Quarterly） Ecating global workers
www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Ecating_global_workers_1375
5..新题型
encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761561730_6/Culture.html
二、2010年考研英语阅读及翻译题的来源

2010年知识运用试题来源：

考研英语完型填空部分，使用了2009年6月6日 Economist 《经济学人》杂志上的一篇文章，文章主要内容，是对社会学上一个经典的理论：霍桑效应的批判和反思。文章难度适中。命题专家在出题的时候也进行了一定程度的改写。

http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_569c4e040100dmkj.html questioning the Hawthorne effect 或Light work; Questioning the Hawthorne effect，June 6, 2009

2010年考研英语阅读真题出处：

第二篇阅读文章

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_09/b4073068471067.htm

第三篇阅读文章：

Harvard_Business_Review200702，标题是：The Accidental Influentials

第四篇阅读文章

Accounting rules are under attack. Standard-setters should defend them. Politicians and banks should back off. Economist Staff - The Economist《经济学人》杂志，April 10, 2009

新题型试题的来源：

http://jobfunctions.bnet.com/abstract.aspx?docid=104383，A Wholesale Shift in European Groceries

2010年翻译真题出处：

原文选自李奥帕德的《沙郡岁月：李奥帕德的自然沉思》，本书是环保生态的经典著作，中译本由吴美真翻译，中国社会科学出版社出版。

给2011年参加考研的学生的几点建议：

1．打好基础，从文章的改写情况和考试命题趋势来看，考研对于大纲词汇要求还是很严格的，所以在准备考试之初就要背好单词，突破单词关。

2．选择较新的辅导材料和语言素材，从最近几年的考试来看，考研阅读理解部分的文章和 考题的风格紧扣时代的节奏，主题很鲜明突出。因此选择合适的考研阅读素材来加强阅读显得非常重要。

三、2010年1月MBA翻译题的来源：摘选自《决胜MBA英语高级篇》
原文是来自一份杂志，叫“experience life”，出题人做了部分改动，原文和改动的文章如下：

Sustainability has become something of a buzzword（出题人把这个单词改为popular word） these days, but to Ted Ning, the concept will always have personal meaning. Having enred a painful period of unsustainability in his own life made it clear to him that sustainability-oriented values must be expressed through everyday action and choice.

Ning, director of LOHAS (Lifestyles of Health and Sustainability), the Boulder, Colo.–based information clearinghouse on sustainable living, recalls spending a tumultuous（出题人把这个词改为了confusing） year in the late ’90s selling insurance. He’d been through the dot-com boom and bust（出题人似乎把这个词改为burst了） and, desperate for a job, signed on with a Boulder agency.

It didn’t go well. “It was a really bad move because that’s not my passion,” says Ning, whose ambivalence about the job translated, predictably, into a lack of sales. “I was miserable. I had so much anxiety that I would pull alongside of the highway and vomit, or wake up in the middle of the night and stare at the ceiling. I had no money and needed the job. Everyone said, ‘Just wait, you’ll turn the corner, give it some time.’”

Ning stuck it out for a year because he simply didn’t know what else to do, but felt his happiness and health suffer as a result. He eventually quit and stumbled upon LOHAS in a help-wanted ad for a data analyst. “I didn’t know what LOHAS was,” he says, “but it sounded kinda neat.” It turned out to be a better fit than he could have ever imagined.

At the time, the LOHAS organization did little more than host a small annual conference in Boulder. It was a forum where progressive-minded companies could gather to compare notes on how to reach a values-driven segment of consumers — the LOHAS market — who seemed attracted to procts and services that mirrored their interest in health, environmental stewardship, social justice, personal development and sustainable living.

In contrast with his disastrous foray into the insurance business, Ning’s new job felt like coming home. Growing up in the foothills of the Rockies outside of Denver, he’d developed a love of the outdoors and a respect for the earth, while his parents provided a model of social activism — the family traveled widely, and at one point his parents created and operated a nonprofit that offered microcredit loans to small businesses in Vietnam and Guatemala. He has three adopted sisters from Vietnam and Korea. He studied international relations and Chinese at Colorado University and slipped easily into the Boulder lifestyle — commuting by bike, eating organics, buying local and the rest — though he stopped short of the patchouli-and-dreadlocks phase embraced by many of his peers. (He opted instead for the university’s ski team and, after graating, wound up coaching the Japanese development team ring the Nagano Olympics in 1998.)

From his ground-level job, Ning moved quickly up the ranks in the organization, becoming its executive director in 2006. “When I got the job, LOHAS was a sleepy conference in Boulder,” says Ning. Today, the forum is booming, the organization is expanding and the market is evolving. Ning has more than grown into the position he stumbled on in the want ads. “I don’t consider this a job. It is really more of a calling.”

Ning, 41, coordinates the conference and oversees the organization’s annual journal and Web site (www.lohas.com), while compiling research on trends and opportunities for businesses. He also travels the country promoting — and explaining — the LOHAS concept and the burgeoning market it represents.

First identified by sociologist Paul Ray in the mid-1990s as “cultural creatives,” the U.S. market segment that embraces LOHAS today has grown to about 41 million consumers, or roughly 19 percent of American alts. But those LOHAS consumers are powerfully influencing the attitudes and behaviors of others (witness the rise of interest in yoga, all-natural procts, simplicity and hybrid vehicles). Which is why LOHAS-related procts now generate an estimated $209 billion annually.

“Over the last two years a green tidal wave has come over us,” says Ning. Riding that wave, says Ning, is not about jumping on a trend bandwagon. It’s connecting with — and acting on — a set of shared, instrinsic values. “People know what is authentic. You can’t preach this lifestyle and not live it,” he says. He and his wife, Jenifer, live in a solar-powered home, raise organic vegetables in their backyard and drive a car that gets 48 miles to the gallon. He even buys carbon offsets to negate the global warming impact of his cell phone.

Ning emphasizes that there are many different ways of “living LOHAS.” Ultimately, it’s really about finding a way of life that makes sense and feels good — now and for the long haul. “People are looking internally,” he says, “asking themselves, ‘What really makes me happy?’ Is it the fact that I can go out and buy that giant flat-screen TV, or is it that I can have a quiet evening with my family just hanging out and playing a game of Scrabble?”

For Ning, it’s a no-brainer. He’ll take Scrabble every time.

⑷ 求14 和15年的考研英语一阅读的全文翻译

考研英语大纲，http://www.kuakao.com/html/63/n-496063.html
http://yz.kuakao.com/bkgl/n-496353.html
红宝书真题的网页版，可能会有翻译什么的，书里的解内析应该容也会有的，

⑸ 考研英语二都考什么只有阅读和翻译吗

完型20题*0.5=10
阅读20题*2=40
新题型5T*2=10
翻译（一小段话）15分
小作文（书信类应用文）） 10分
大作文（图回表类） 15分
英语二备考用书答（仅供参考）：
单词可以用朱伟的恋恋有词，
阅读理解和真题可以用张剑的黄皮书，都有详解，比较好。
如果语法不好的话也可以买本语法书，作为辅助工具。

⑹ 考研英语一和英语二的难度、区别

考研分英语一和英语二，有不同的专业分别对应。一般来说英语一都比英语二要难，所要掌握英语知识就更多。

英语二比英语一简单些，具体表现在：

1.文章的难度。英语二的阅读文章4篇大概1500词左右，长难句少；英语一4篇文章共1600词，长难句略多于英语二。

完型英语二是在一篇350词左右的文章里挖20个空，英语一是在240-260个词的文章里挖20个空。

2. 题型不同。题型方面，英语一与英语二的区别在于新题型和翻译。

新题型英语一有七选五、排序和标题对应，七选五和排序比较难，需要通读全文，理清上下句段，标题对应简单，但是很少考；英语二是标题对应和多项对应，相对简单。

翻译英语一是一篇文章挑出5最长最难的句子翻译，且文章多偏向学术性；英语二是一个小短文，难句不多，内容大多是故事。

3分值不同。英语一的翻译难且只有10分，作文30分；英语二翻译15分，作文25。

不管是英语一还是英语好，基础扎实就不担心。这家考研英语课程效果做的不错，在备考的考生可以领取他们家的免费试听课程，体验一下：【https://www.acadsoc.com】

他们家的外教均持有tesol证书，并是国内唯一一家可在线查询外教资质的机构，质量很有保障，价格也实惠，才是20元左右。

还有其他什么学习问题，可以网络搜“阿西吧vivi老师”为您分析解答。

想要更多的英语学习资源，可以网络搜“阿西吧官网论坛”免费下载。

⑺ 做考研英语真题后，翻译近30多篇真题阅读，这样做对其它题型帮助大吗

有用，非常有用！！！
每天一篇，逐句翻译，你能发现自己到底是长难句有问题还是单纯的词汇问题。把翻译不出来或者翻译的很糟糕的句子拿出来，最后一个星期反复写，进步很快。