A. 2010年考研英语TEXT1，我已想起了四题的内容，跟大家分享！
21. It is indicated in Paragraphs 1 and 2 that
A arts criticism has disappeared from big-city newspapers.
B English-language newspapers used to carry more arts reviews.
C high-quality newspapers retain a large body of readers.
D young readers doubt the suitability of criticism on dailies.
22. Newspaper reviews in England before World War 2 were characterized by
A free themes.
B casual style.
C elaborate layout.
D radical viewpoints.
23. Which of the following would shaw and Newman most probably agree on?
A It is writers' ty to fulfill journalistic goals.
B It is contemptible for writers to be journalists.
C Writers are likely to be tempted into journalism.
D Not all writers are capable of journalistic writing.
24. What can be learned about Cars according to the last two paragraphs?
A His music criticism may not appeal to readers today.
B His reputation as a music critic has long been in dispute.
C His style caters largely to modern specialists.
D His writings fail to follow the amateur tradition.
25. What would be the best title for the text?
A Newspapers of the Good Old Days
B The Lost Horizon in Newspapers
C Mournful Decline of Journalism
D Prominent Critics in Memory
B. 谁知道2010考研英语真题第一篇阅读
考过就忘了一干二净的。。。个人觉得第二个难。
C. 2010年考研英语阅读A难度
不用灰心。还早呢！我刚开始复习英语的时候，基本什么都不会，最后还能考到快六十了。你比我好多了，好好复习，端正心态一定没问题。
D. 张剑的《2010考研英语第一时间—英语阅读理解精练100篇》大家有用过的么
我买的就是那本，是张剑和王轶群编的，星火出的，差的很，文章没头没尾，可回能是王轶群编的，答张剑只是挂个名而已，看了有三十篇，感觉真的挺差，王轶群的评价是“考研没有王轶群，考研复习不完整”，感觉真是厚脸皮，编的是很垃圾，不如买张剑的《150篇》，或者黄宝书吧 个人建议！仅供参考！ 查看原帖>>
E. 2010 考研英语阅读 第一篇中的一句话 不理解。
to，本身就是一个介词，是用来完美修饰一段句子使用的。那个，翻译不是直译。根据整回句的意思答，按语境翻译的。翻译出来可以说是严肃的事业，因为business做名词时是有事业这个中文意思的。
to know的用法，举个简单的例子：I need to know，翻译出来就是，我需要知道。 Glad to know you 等等，反正你记住一个简单的，know的前缀修饰，大部分都是跟随 to这个介词的。
因为最后一句的what they were about主语是——like George Bernard Shaw and Ernest （所以，是指举出的这些名人他们自己知道在做什么”）这些其实蛮简单的。你考研不要把精力放在这种小题上，关键多练听力，多练写作。多背单词、词组。
F. 考研英语2010真题第一篇阅读里的一句,求翻译.
你可能是对其中几个主要单词的意思没有弄明白，vast body of约等于a great number of 许多，大量;save是“除了”的意思，约等于except.
G. 2010考研英语第一篇阅读题目是什么
Text 1
Of all the changes that have taken place in English-language newspapers ring the past quarter-century, perhaps the most far-reaching has been the inexorable decline in the scope and seriousness of their arts coverage.(T1)
It is difficult to the point of impossibility for the average reader under the age of forty to imagine a time when high-quality arts criticism could be found in most bit-city newspapers. Yet a considerable number of the most significant collections of criticism published in the 20th century consisted in large part of newspaper reviews. To read such books today is to marvel at the fact that their learned contents were once deemed suitable for publication in general-circulation dailies.
We are even farther removed from the unfocused newspaper reviews published in England between the turn of the 20th century and the eve of World War 2,at a time when newsprint was dirt-cheap and stylish arts criticism was considered an ornament to the publications in which it appeared. In those far-off days, it was taken for granted that the critics of major papers would write in detail and at length about the events they covered. Theirs was a serious business. and even those reviews who wore their learning lightly, like George Bernard Shaw and Ernest Newman, could be trusted to know what they were a out. These men believed in journalism as a calling , and were proud to be published in the daily press. 'So few authors have brains enough or literary gift enough to keep their own end up in journalism,' Newman wrote, "that I am tempted to define "journalism" as "a term of contempt applied by writers who are not read to writers who are".'
Unfortunately, these critics are virtually forgotten. Neville Cars, who wrote for the Manchester Guardian from 1917 until shortly before his death in 1975, is now known solely as a writer of essays on the game of cricket. During his lifetime, though, he was also one of England's foremost classical-music critics, and a stylist so widely admired that his Autobiography (1947) became a best-seller. He was knighted in 1967,the first music critic to be so honored. Yet only one of his books is now in print, and his vast body of writings on music is unknown save to specialists.
Is there any chance that Cars's criticism will enjoy a revival? The prospect seems remote. Journalistic tastes had changed long before his death, and postmodern readers have little use for the richly uphostered Vicwardian prose in which he specialized. Moreover, the amateur tradition in music criticism has been in headlong retreat.
21. It is indicated in Paragraphs 1 and 2 that
A arts criticism has disappeared from big-city newspapers.
B English-language newspapers used to carry more arts reviews.
C high-quality newspapers retain a large body of readers.
D young readers doubt the suitability of criticism on dailies.
22. Newspaper reviews in England before World War 2 were characterized by
A free themes.
B casual style.
C elaborate layout.
D radical viewpoints.
23. Which of the following would shaw and Newman most probably agree on?
A It is writers' ty to fulfill journalistic goals.
B It is contemptible for writers to be journalists.
C Writers are likely to be tempted into journalism.
D Not all writers are capable of journalistic writing.
24. What can be learned about Cars according to the last two paragraphs?
A His music criticism may not appeal to readers today.
B His reputation as a music critic has long been in dispute.
C His style caters largely to modern specialists.
D His writings fail to follow the amateur tradition.
25. What would be the best title for the text?
A Newspapers of the Good Old Days
B The Lost Horizon in Newspapers
C Mournful Decline of Journalism
D Prominent Critics in Memory
新东方版