⑴ 2014年英语考研阅读是不是很简单
2014年考研英语考试阅读整体难度持续稳定
我发现70%的考生认为今年考研英语整体的难度是稳中稍微有点偏容易的，有20%的考生认为很难，最后剩下10%的考生难度是适中的。通过这样简单的调查可以看出，这背后会有一个样本量的问题。今年的考试整体而言第一感觉，整体上从完形填空最后到作文，看完以后，最强烈的感觉，我们的难度非常稳定，考研英语的考试，在整体的15年的过程当中，一直都保持着。虽然说他每年在题型上，或者说在题目的这种设计上，或者在文章的选取上有一点点不同，整体而言已经是一个难度非常稳定的选拔性的考试。如果说大家感觉到这个题目做完了以后，感觉到这个题目是偏简单了一点，你可以问问自己，是哪个地方相对来说偏简单了，整体上从阅读的这四篇文章具体来看，我认为其中难度是非常非常稳定的，这是跟今天大家交代的第一件事情。为什么这么说？因为在考试之前，同学们肯定也曾经做过历年的真题，我们会发现这十年选取的这些文章，文章本身的难度而言，确实有的文章会复杂一点，看完一遍两遍之后，不知道他到底要说什么，而有的文章相比来说偏简单一些，把这个文章整体读完了以后好简单，迅速把握住了这篇文章的主线，发现整体这篇文章的主旨和态度到底在什么地方。
题目选项另有玄机
但是，如果说做完了后面的题目，再对完了答案之后，会惊讶的发现，难的文章，后面的题目说不定对的还比较多，这样一些简单的文章，你会发现后面的题目依旧是保持很难的规律，也许会说是不是因为读简单文章的时候，警觉性相对来说降低了，所以出来的分数是低的，不是这样的。这是通过对于近15年真题的每一道题目的难度系数的研究，你会发现每一篇文章的难度系数基本上是稳定的，考研命题专家基本上是控制在45%在55%之间，什么意思呢？就是如果每篇文章，我们按照一百分的满分来看，平均分值是会在45到55之间，文章本身你做完了以后的难易程度，跟后面的率不一定成一个正相关的关系。
细节题占主体位置
为什么这样？通过后面整个2014年考过的这20道题目来看，具体把这20道题目进行一个分类、归纳、整理，我们会发现70%的题目，都是涉及到文章当中的某一个具体的细节，比如说细节题在整体的考研阅读当中占据了一个举足轻重的地位。70%的题目是细节题，说明什么问题？说明把握住文章当中的一些具体信息的能力，是至关重要的，是重中之重的。换句话说，如果整个这篇文章，读下来，发现这篇文章并没有给它读的非常的明白和透彻，是否会影响到我们后面的解题？一定会在某种程度上影响，但是会不会带来一个致命性的影响？绝对不会，也就是说这70%的细节题，我们其实每一道题目都能够非常清楚地回到原文当中，借助原文当中的某一句话，或者是某两三句话就能得出正确答案的，说到这个地方，同学们就明白了，在我们整体的考研阅读当中，所需要具备的一个最重要的能力是什么？就是如何去看到题目之后，定准了位，并且找到那个我们真正应该找到的位置，在四个选项当中去找意思的原文最匹配的选项。
⑵ 2014考研英语一难吗
您好 我也是一名考研人 时间不多了 紧张中
跨考教育为您服务 生而为赢 考研路上加内油 祝我们那可爱的前途容光明
http://d.kuakao.com/pub/yingyu/
⑶ 14年考研英语难吗
我这里有14年英语一两篇阅读真题，你看看吧，或许对你有帮助
Text 1
In order to “change lives for the better” and rece “dependency”, George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer, introced the "upfront work search" scheme. Only if the jobless arrive at the job centre with a CV, register for the online job search, and start looking for work will they be eligible for benefit—and then they should report weekly rather than fortnightly. What could be more reasonable?
More apparent reasonableness followed. There will now be a seven-day wait for the jobseeker’s allowance. “Those first few days should be spent looking for work, not looking to sign on.” he claimed, “We’re doing these things because we know they help people stay off benefits and help those on benefits get into work faster.” Help? Really? On first hearing, this was the socially concerned chancellor, trying to change lives for the better, complete with “reforms” to an obviously inlgent system that demands too little effort from the newly unemployed to find work, and subsidises laziness. What motivated him, we were to understand was his zeal for “fundamental fairness”—protecting the taxpayer, controlling spending and ensuring that only the most deserving claimants received their benefits.
Losing a job is hurting: you don’t skip down to the job centre with a song in your heart, delighted at the prospect of doubling your income from the generous state. It is financially terrifying, psychologically embarrassing and you know that support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get. You are now not wanted; you are now excluded from the work environment that offers purpose and structure in your life. Worse, the crucial income to feed yourself and your family and pay the bills has disappeared. Ask anyone newly unemployed what they want and the answer is always: a job.
But in Osborneland, your first instinct is to fall into dependency—permanent dependency if you can get it—supported by a state only too ready to inlge your falsehood. It is as though 20 years of ever –tougher reforms of the job search and benefit administration system never happened. The principle of British welfare is no longer that you can insure yourself against the risk of unemployment and receive unconditional payments if the disaster happens. Even the very phrase “jobseeker’s allowance” is about redefining the unemployed as a “jobseeker” who had no fundamental right to benefit he or she has earned through making national insurance contributions. Instead, the claimant receives a time-limited “allowance”, conditional on actively seeking a job: no entitlement and no insurance, at £71.70 a week ,one of the least generous in the EU.
21. George Osborne’s scheme was intended to
[A] provide the unemployed with easier access to benefits.
[B] encourage jobseeker’ s active engagement in job seeking.
[C] motivate the unemployed to report voluntarily.
[D] guarantee jobseekers’ legitimate right to benefit.
22. The phase “to sign on”(Line 3,Para.2)most probably means
[A] to check on the availability of jobs at the job centre.
[B] to accept the government’s restrictions on the government.
[C] to register for an allowance from the government.
[D] to attend a governmental job-training program.
23. What prompted the chancellor to develop his scheme?
[A] A desire to secure a better life for all.
[B] An eagerness to protect the unemployed.
[C] An urge to be generous to the claimants.
[D] A passion to ensure fairness for taxpayers.
24. According to Paragraph 3, being unemployed makes one feel
[A] uneasy.
[B] enraged.
[C] insulted.
[D] guilty.
25. To which of the following would the author most probably agree?
[A] The British welfare system inlges jobseekers’ laziness.
[B] Osborne’s reform will rece the risk of unemployment.
[C] The jobseekers’ allowance has met their actual needs.
[D] Unemployment benefits should not be made conditional.
Text 2
All around the world, lawyers generate more hostility than the members of any other profession—with the possible exception of journalism. But there are few places where clients have more grounds for complaint than America.
During the decade before the economic crisis, spending on legal services in America grew twice as fast as inflation. The best lawyers made skyscrapers-full of money, tempting ever more students to pile into law schools. But most law graates never get a big-firm job. Many of them instead become the kind of nuisance-lawsuit filer that makes the tort system a costly nightmare.
There are many reasons for this. One is the excessive costs of a legal ecation. There is just one path for a lawyer in most American states; a four-year undergraate degree in some unrelated subject, then a three-year law degree at one of 200 law schools authorized by the American Bar Association and an expensive preparation for the bar exam. This leaves today’s average law-school graate with $100,000 of debt on top of undergraate debts. Law-school debt means that they have to work fearsomely hard.
Reforming the system would help both lawyers and their customers. Sensible ideas have been around for a long time, but the state-level bodies that govern the profession have been too conservative to implement them. One idea is to allow people to study law as an undergraate degree. Another is to let students sit for the bar after only two years of law school. If the bar exam is truly a stern enough test for a would-be lawyer, those who can sit it earlier should be allowed to do so. Students who do need the extra training could cut their debt mountain by a third.
The other reason why costs are so high is the restrictive guild-like ownership structure of the business. Except in the District of Columbia, non-lawyers may not own any share of a law firm. This keeps fees high and innovation slow. There is pressure for change from within the profession, but opponents of change among the regulators insist that keeping outsiders out of a law firm isolates lawyers from the pressure to make money rather than serve clients ethically.
In fact, allowing non-lawyers to own shares in law firms would rece costs and improve services to customers, by encouraging law firms to use technology and to employ professional managers to focus on improving firms’ efficiency. After all, other countries, such as Australia and Britain, have started liberalizing their legal professions. America should follow.
26. A lot of students take up law as their profession e to
[A] the growing demand from clients
[B] the increasing pressure of inflation
[C] the prospect of working in big firms
[D] the attraction of financial rewards
27. Which of the following adds to the costs of legal ecation in most American states?
[A] Higher tuition fees for undergraate studies
[B] Receiving training by professional associations
[C] Admissions approval from the bar association
[D] Pursuing a bachelors degree in another major
28. Hindrance to the reform of the legal system originates from
[A] the rigid bodies governing the profession
[B] lawyers’ and clients’ strong resistance
[C] the stern exam for would-be lawyers.
[D] non-professionals’ sharp criticism
29. The guild-like ownership structure is considered “restrictive” partly because
[A] prevents lawyers from gaining e profits.
[B] bans outsiders’ involvement in the profession.
[C] aggravates the ethical situation in the trade.
[D] keeps lawyers from holding law-firm shares.
30. In the text, the author mainly discusses
[A] the factors that help make a successful lawyer in America.
[B] a problem in America’s legal profession and solutions to it.
[C] the role undergraate studies in America’s legal ecation.
[D] flawed ownership of America’s law firms and its causes.
⑷ 2014年考研英语阅读理解都错了5个，这个水平算什么档次
我2014年考研67，北京批改的严，阅读错了6个，希望你借鉴下
⑸ 有14年考研的吗请问觉得英语难度怎么样
感觉难度没有增加吧，阅读最后一篇略感觉难
⑹ 14年考研数学一，英语一相对于去年难吗14是不是小年
无论试题难不难对选拔性考试的结果都没有影响，复习得充分的考生能考好，没好好复习的考不好。发挥失常和超常发挥的可能性都很小，做好自己应该做的就好。祝成功。
⑺ 2014年考研英语难吗
2014年的英语考试已经比去年较难，考研阅读特点之一是文章很难读懂，有些考生由回于词汇量小，答句子分析能力差，根本读不懂文章，所以也无法考到理想的分数。其次是选项迷惑性大，排除错误选项需要很多时间，而且不一定选对。作为考研英语试卷体系中发展最成熟、题型最稳定的部分，阅读主要考查的是考生理解文章结构、把握具体信息和解答不同类型题目的能力。
⑻ 2014年考研英语一难吗
2014考研英语一不难。
考研英语复习计划：
1、重点是考研词汇、基本语法，同时内，阅读理解训容练也要开始。语法等不会有什么变化，词汇每年大纲虽然有所修订，但变动不大，因此找本前一年的《大纲》先看着。有许多同学正好在这一阶段考CET6级，由于6级和考研难度大致相当，词汇量也差不多，所以可以结合起来复习。
2、词汇方面，应该在已经大体掌握意思的基础上，开始深入掌握用法，尤其是固定搭配和习惯用法。另一个重点是解决长难句，掌握各种句式。同时要加大阅读量，一方面提高阅读能力，另一方面也通过阅读来巩固语法、词汇和句式。本阶段必须进行相当量的题型专项练习，通过做题来巩固。
3、冲刺复习阶段的重要任务也有两个，一是进行大量模考练习，二是强化训练短文写作。对短文写作的强化，首先要对可能的命题范围作出预测。考研英语作文命题不会冷僻，不会很专业，通常都与学习生活紧密联系，或反映当前社会热点问题。例如保持健康、如何读书、环境保护、乱承诺等都曾是出题范围。了解到这些大概范围后，有意识地多阅读一些相关文章，熟悉有关观点、句式、词汇，多动笔写写，在考场上就可成竹在胸。
⑼ 2014年考研英语一阅读平均分是多少
全国来看可能只有10左右，不会很高的