1. 英語口語辯論呀
1 經驗是用時間來積累，可以幫我們快速做出第一反應。have a rapid reaction
2經驗能鍛煉我們的綜合版實力，提高各種權能力。improve actually ability.
3積累更多的經驗，是生活中的一筆財富。experience means corns.
2. 急急急！！！求人幫忙寫下英語辯論的雙人對話，口語考試用，
2.汽車的弊大於利
世界上任何事物均具兩面性，人類的聰明處在於趨利避害，盡可能利用和擴大其有利的方面，迴避和縮小其不利之處。當前人們對待汽車時態度亦如此。
The world everything has two sides, human wisdom is that draw on the advantages and avoid disadvantages, as far as possible the use of and expand its positive aspects, avoid and rece its disadvantages. At present people treat vehicleattitude also so.
汽車的問世和發展，極大地方便了人類的活動，有人說它無異是縮小了地球，延長了人的生命。不過汽車在造福於人類的同時，也帶來了禍害，而且這種禍害日益嚴重，因此又有人稱它為「城市殺手」。
The advent and development of automotive, greatly facilitates human activities,some people say it is down to earth, extend the life of the people. But the car for the benefit of mankind at the same time, also brought harm, and the harm is becoming more and more serious, so it is also called "city killer".
由汽車引起的交通事故每年吞噬數十萬人的性命。據記載，汽車於1896年撞死了第一名行人。兩年之後，即1898年，第一名司機在交通事故中喪生。從那時以來，汽車已經「殺死」3000多萬人。特別是90年代開始，死於汽車交通事故的人數急劇增加，平均每年達50多萬。這個數字超過艾滋病、戰爭和結核病人年死亡數，僅少於憂鬱症和心臟病人年死亡數。
The car caused by traffic accidents every year hundreds of thousands of livesphagocytosis. According to the record, the car in 1896 killed a pedestrian. Two years later, in 1898, the first driver died in the traffic accident. Since then, the carhas "killed" about 30000000. Especially in the beginning of the 90's, people died intraffic accidents has increased dramatically, the average of about 500000 a year.This figure more than AIDS, tuberculosis patient years war and death, only less than depression and heart disease death number.
由於發展中國家汽車破舊，路況差，管理不嚴，司機和行人缺乏交通知識，加上發生事故後搶救不及時，因此交通事故死亡人數大大高於發達國家，佔世界交通事故死亡總人數的70％以上。
Due to the developing automobile old, poor road conditions, lax management,driver and pedestrian traffic accident, lack of knowledge, plus the rescue is not timely, so the traffic accident death toll is much higher than that of developedcountries, the total number of death in the world of traffic accident
More than 70%.
汽車排出的尾氣嚴重威脅人類健康。如今世界上許多大城市的空氣都已嚴重污染，汽車排出的尾氣是最大的污染源之一。空氣污染加劇了哮喘，支氣管炎、肺癌以及各種心血管疾病的發作，甚至置人於死命。據統計，墨西哥城每年有1．25萬人死於空氣污染造成的呼吸系統疾病；以交通阻塞聞名於世的曼谷城，污濁的空氣中含有38種細菌和真茵，它們導致人們腹瀉、血液中毒和患腦膜炎。泰國研究人員的報告指出，正是這種空氣污染使他們的人均壽命比日本，美國等國少了十六七歲，俄羅斯汽車排放的有害物質比美歐國家高39倍。從1993年至1997年，由於空氣污染使莫斯科新生畸形兒童增加30％，兒童血液病增加50％。
Vehicle exhaust serious threat to human health. Now many big city in the world hasthe serious pollution of air, vehicle exhaust is the biggest source of pollution. Air pollution exacerbated asthma, bronchitis, lung cancer and onset of cardiovascular disease, even the man. According to statistics, there are 12500 people die fromrespiratory diseases caused by air pollution in Mexico city each year to traffic congestion; world-famous Bangkok city, dirty air contains 38 kinds of bacteria andfungi, which leads to diarrhea, blood poisoning and meningitis. The Thailand researchers report points out, it is the air pollution so that the average life expectancy than Japan, countries such as USA sixteen less seven years, Russianvehicle emissions of harmful substances is 39 times higher than the US and European countries. From 1993 to 1997, because of the air pollution that Moscowneonatal deformity children increased 30%, 50% increase in children with hematological diseases.
汽車造成的噪音也危害人類。專家們說，人的聽覺可接受的合適音量為30分貝。但現在不少城市車輛造成的噪音在70分貝以上，有些城市如開羅市中心的噪音甚至達到90分貝。這不僅會引起耳聾，還會造成神經系統紊亂和心臟病等。
The automobile caused noise is harmful to human. Experts say, the appropriatevolume of human auditory acceptable was 30 db. But now many city vehicles causenoise at 70 dB above, some city such as Cairo city noise even up to 90 db. This will not only cause deafness, still can cause disorders of the nervous system and heart disease.
所以 我認為汽車的存在弊大於利
So I think the existence of the automobile does more harm than good
3. 英語口語和書面語哪個重要 明天就是英語辯論會了,請高人講解!（盡量詳細一些）
如果在高中階段的話,還是書面語重要,因為高中階段英語都是以考試為主,口語牽扯的很少
4. 辯論賽（在英語學習中，寫作重要還是口語重要）
辯論的時候，尤其是在提問環節一定要把住一點：寫作不是書寫，寫作是指正式書面語言的能力，不是那種只會寫英文但是一點都不會說的，跟啞巴英語不完全是一個概念。如果對方指出任何關於不能說英語的論點論據，一定要當場指出對方是在偷換概念，「那麼按照對方辯友所說的認為寫作重要就是完全不具備英語口頭表達的能力，是不是就意味著你們認為學習英語口語比較重要指的是只會說英語而完全不認識英語單詞的英文白丁呢」。如果對方承認，那你們就贏了，因為只要會寫，就能通過電腦手機和紙筆等媒介進行交流，可以取得跟口頭交流一樣的功效雖然只是慢一點，但是如果只會說英語但是單詞一概不認識，那麼除了口頭溝通以外沒有其他作用了，英語書也看不懂，就算口語能上天，出國走在大街上連路牌都看不懂，更不用提官方場合、書信往來或者正式合同了。不識字的人出國留學或者找工作都是不可能的。
在這個基本前提之下，我們的觀點：
1.書面表達雖然有的時候繁瑣一些，在生活當中運用起來顯得過於正式，但是依然可以起到正常交流的作用。就算說起來不像注重口語表達那樣流利或者不能表達的那麼合適，依然可以發揮功能。
2.先重點學習寫作可以使作為第二或者第三語言學習的人打好語法基礎，這樣在學好了學做的基礎之上再學習口語就會容易很多。如果相反，先重點學習口語，極容易導致學不好寫作，因為英語口語是很隨意的，一旦口語的模式先入為主，很容易忽略今後寫作中出現的錯誤，導致學不好這門語言。（在這一點上可以找一些實際的論據，很多母語為英語的人經常在書面表達中出現語法錯誤，所以如果你留過學就會知道，寫論文的時候語法是作業要求中的一項，這一項不是為了外國人准備的，而是很多本地人的語法也不嚴謹）
另外還有一點，就是我們所討論的寫作和口語都是以第一人稱表達的能力，不是接受感知的能力，所以默認的環境是對於聽力的能力是一樣的。比如如果對方說看美劇什麼的，這個根本不在我們的討論范圍之內，因為看美劇需要的是聽力，你不需要跟屏幕交流。
5. 急需英語口語辯論翻譯~~~請進~~~
watching TV，以下的可以參考：）~~
TV is still a major access to the outside world, an effective medium for knowledge learning, a valuable chance to experience society harmlessly, and an easy way to relax. I prefer watching TV to reading books, for I think watching requires less effort. Moving pictures appear to be more impressive as well.
Studies by experts have clearly shown us that the programme of featuring violence will surely cast an ill effect on the behavior of children,who are too young to distinguish virtue from evil,and consequently will act violence out in reality.
As a result,the report of juvenile delinquenxy are not uncommon.
Unless proper action can be taken in time to regulate the current problem,our socity will be left a world of violence.
It is evil, because it has exposed people, especially inexperienced youngsters, directly to all kinds of ugliness. As the TV instry develops, TV screens begin to be filled with pornography,violence and nonsense. Bad programs and ugly language seriously influence televiewers.
6. 英語辯論 學英語口語重要還是筆試重要
我覺得當然是口語比較重要，要溝通當然是口語咯，用寫作多少慢啊。現在外面有回很多的英語培訓機構都是培答訓學員的口語能力，出去找工作最先主要的也是培訓口語能力的。我現在就在中山公園的昂立新動態國際英語學習口語，環境也很好，老師教的也很好的。而寫作，有了一定的基礎之後就可以寫了呀。所以還是口語比較重要。
7. 英語口語重要英文辯論稿，給例子即可謝咯！
親。。你把上面的換一下就好了嘛 - -不過上面的有點點錯誤。。額 修改下。比方這樣的：
Grammar is important, but when it compares withs poken language, it is the root and leaves, spoken english is the root. By saying so, I don't mean tha we don't have to learn grammar,but first of all,we should have the root, that this to say practical ability is more important. nowadays, the society is a communicative one. people need to communicate with each other. when we talk with someone, what matters is that if you express yourselves well or not, but not if you are right in gramar or not.
8. 英語口語辯論賽有用句型
你這個題目很寬泛。。有個英語辯論賽技巧的帖子，希望能對你有用 On Debating Clarity: Avoise of terms which can be interpreted differently by different readers.When we are talking to people who substantially agree with us we canuse such terms as "rednecks" or "liberals" and feel reasonably surethat we will be understood. But in a debate, we are talking to peoplewho substantially disagree with us and they are likely to put adifferent interpretation on such words. Evidence:Quoting an authority is not evidence. Quoting a majority opinion is notevidence. Any argument that starts with, "According to Einstein..." isnot based on objective evidence. Any argument that starts with, "Mostbiologists believe..." is not based on objective evidence. Saying, "TheBible says..." is not evidence. Authorities and majorities can be wrongand frequently have been. （歷屆辯論賽中出現最多的問題） Emotionalism: Avoidemotionally charged words--words that are likely to proce more heatthan light. Certainly the racial, ethnic, or religious hate words haveno place in rational debating. Likewise, avoid argumentum ad hominem.Personal attacks on your opponent are an admission of intellectualbankruptcy. Also, slurs directed at groups with whom your opponent isidentified are usually nonproctive. Try to keep attention centered onthe objective problem itself. There is a special problem when debatingsocial, psychological, political, or religious ideas because a person'stheories about these matters presumably have some effect on his ownlife style. In other words, rather than saying "and that's why you aresuch an undisciplined wreck" say, "a person adopting your position is,I believe, likely to become an undisciplined wreck because ..." Causality: Avoid the blunder of asserting a causal relationship with the popular fallacy of post hoc ergo propter hocwhich declares that because some event A happened and immediatelyafterward event B happened that event A was the cause of event B.(Iknew someone whose car stalled on the way to work. She would get outand open the hood and slam it and then the car would start. Singing asong would have been just as effective to allow time for a vapor lockto dissipate!) Also avoid the popular fallacy that correlation provescausation. People who own Cadillacs, on average, have higher incomesthan people who don't. This does not mean that if we provided peoplewith Cadillacs that they would have higher incomes. Innuendo(影射):Innuendois saying something pejorative about your opponent without coming rightout and saying it but by making more or less veiled allusions to somecircumstance, rumor, or popular belief. If you want to see someexcellent examples of innuendo, watch Rush Limbaugh. Politicians are,unfortunately, frequently guilty of using innuendo. It is an easy wayto capitalize on popular prejudices without having to make explicitstatements which might be difficult or impossible to defend againstrational attack. Besure of your facts. What is the source of your information? If it is anewspaper or a magazine, are you sure that the information hasn't been"slanted" to agree with that publication's political bias? Wherecrucial facts are concerned, it is best to check with more than onesource. Often international publications will give you a differentperspective than your hometown newspaper. Check to see whether the bookyou are using was published by a regular publishing company or whetherit was published by some special interest group like the John BirchSociety or a religious organization. These books cannot be trusted topresent unbiased evidence since their motivation for publishing is nottruth but rather the furtherance of some political or religious view. Understandyour opponents' arguments. It is good practice to argue with a friendand take a position with which you do not agree. In this way you maydiscover some of the assumptions your opponents are making which willhelp you in the debate. Remember that everybody thinks that hisposition is the right one, and everybody has his reasons for thinkingso. Do not impute ridiculous or malevolent ideas to your opponent. An example of this is the rhetorical statement, "Haveyou stopped beating your wife?" This imputes or presupposes that youropponent has beaten his wife. One frequently sees references byconservative speakers and writers to the idea that gay activists want"special privileges." This would be ridiculous if it were true. Itisn't true, but speaking as if it were true and well known to all isegregiously unfair to listeners or readers who may not be wellinformed. It is probably always wise to treat your opponent withrespect, even if he doesn't deserve it. If he doesn't deserve respect,this will probably soon become obvious enough. Regression to the mean(邏輯退化):Another source of error which occurs very frequently is the failure totake into account regression to the mean. This is a bit technical, butit is very important, especially in any kind of social or psychologicalresearch which depends upon statistical surveys or even experimentswhich involve statistical sampling. Rather than a general statement ofthe principle (which becomes more and more unintelligible as thestatement becomes more and more rigorous) an example will be used. Let's consider intelligence testing. 1.Perhaps we have a drug that is supposed to raise the IQ of mentallyretarded kids. So we give a thousand intelligence tests and select the30 lowest scoring indivials. 2. We then give these low scoring kids our drug and test them again. 3. We find that there has been an increase in the average of their IQ scores. 4. Is this evidence that the drug increased the IQ? Notnecessarily! Suppose we want to show that smoking marijuana lowers theIQ. Well, we take the 30 highest scoring kids in our sample and givethem THC and test them again. We find a lower average IQ. Is this evidence that marijuana lowers the IQ? Notnecessarily! Any statistician knows that if you make some kind of ameasurement of some attribute of a large sample of people and thenselect the highest and lowest scoring indivials and make the samemeasurement again, the high scoring group will have a lower averagescore and the low scoring group will have a higher average score thanthey did the first time. This is called "regression to the mean" and itis a perfectly universal statistical principle. Thereare undoubtedly more points to be made here. Suggestions will begratefully received. Larry has made the following suggestions: · Apply the scientific method. （運用科學方法） · Cite relevant personal experience. （合理引用相關的個人經歷） · Be polite. （辯論過程中有禮待人） · Organize your response. (Beginning, middle, end.) （對你辯詞進行合理的組織） · Treat people as indivials. · Cite sources for statistics and studies used. · Literacy works. Break posts into sentences and paragraphs. · Read the post you are responding to. Stay open to learning
9. 如何進行模擬辯論英語口語教學
口語是寫作的基礎，就像一個幼年孩子，總是在模仿他人的口型說話，然版後慢慢掌握一權種語言的技巧，繼而學會寫作，我認為，寫作時語言的升華與深入，而口語是語言的基礎與引領，英語作為大多數人的第二母語，應該是先學會口語然後寫作
10. 英語口語辯論話題
Computers to students is good or bad (電腦對學生是好是壞 )
答！ Some good and some bad （有好也有壞）