『壹』 初中水平雙人英語辯論
主題：中學生使用手機的利弊
學生A: As every body knows, mobiles are playing a important part in our daily life nowadays.
First, mobiles make it convinent for people to keep in touch with each other whevere they are.Especially when they have something important.It reces the cost for people dont have to travel a long way to get to know the things in person
Second,we can send messages by mobiles with little money,just 0.01 yuan for each short message.
Third, we can also play games or take photoes or listen to music on the mobiles,late we do many things on them with the development of technology.
學生B：I don't really agree with you.Mobile phones also have many disadvatages.The radioactivites may do harm to our health.Sometimes the rings may affect others in public or at meetings.Also, it is not good for students if they bring their phone to school because the student won't pay attention to what the teachers are trying to say. Theres's still many problems left.
『貳』 急急急！！！求人幫忙寫下英語辯論的雙人對話，口語考試用，
2.汽車的弊大於利
世界上任何事物均具兩面性，人類的聰明處在於趨利避害，盡可能利用和擴大其有利的方面，迴避和縮小其不利之處。當前人們對待汽車時態度亦如此。
The world everything has two sides, human wisdom is that draw on the advantages and avoid disadvantages, as far as possible the use of and expand its positive aspects, avoid and rece its disadvantages. At present people treat vehicleattitude also so.
汽車的問世和發展，極大地方便了人類的活動，有人說它無異是縮小了地球，延長了人的生命。不過汽車在造福於人類的同時，也帶來了禍害，而且這種禍害日益嚴重，因此又有人稱它為「城市殺手」。
The advent and development of automotive, greatly facilitates human activities,some people say it is down to earth, extend the life of the people. But the car for the benefit of mankind at the same time, also brought harm, and the harm is becoming more and more serious, so it is also called "city killer".
由汽車引起的交通事故每年吞噬數十萬人的性命。據記載，汽車於1896年撞死了第一名行人。兩年之後，即1898年，第一名司機在交通事故中喪生。從那時以來，汽車已經「殺死」3000多萬人。特別是90年代開始，死於汽車交通事故的人數急劇增加，平均每年達50多萬。這個數字超過艾滋病、戰爭和結核病人年死亡數，僅少於憂鬱症和心臟病人年死亡數。
The car caused by traffic accidents every year hundreds of thousands of livesphagocytosis. According to the record, the car in 1896 killed a pedestrian. Two years later, in 1898, the first driver died in the traffic accident. Since then, the carhas "killed" about 30000000. Especially in the beginning of the 90's, people died intraffic accidents has increased dramatically, the average of about 500000 a year.This figure more than AIDS, tuberculosis patient years war and death, only less than depression and heart disease death number.
由於發展中國家汽車破舊，路況差，管理不嚴，司機和行人缺乏交通知識，加上發生事故後搶救不及時，因此交通事故死亡人數大大高於發達國家，佔世界交通事故死亡總人數的70％以上。
Due to the developing automobile old, poor road conditions, lax management,driver and pedestrian traffic accident, lack of knowledge, plus the rescue is not timely, so the traffic accident death toll is much higher than that of developedcountries, the total number of death in the world of traffic accident
More than 70%.
汽車排出的尾氣嚴重威脅人類健康。如今世界上許多大城市的空氣都已嚴重污染，汽車排出的尾氣是最大的污染源之一。空氣污染加劇了哮喘，支氣管炎、肺癌以及各種心血管疾病的發作，甚至置人於死命。據統計，墨西哥城每年有1．25萬人死於空氣污染造成的呼吸系統疾病；以交通阻塞聞名於世的曼谷城，污濁的空氣中含有38種細菌和真茵，它們導致人們腹瀉、血液中毒和患腦膜炎。泰國研究人員的報告指出，正是這種空氣污染使他們的人均壽命比日本，美國等國少了十六七歲，俄羅斯汽車排放的有害物質比美歐國家高39倍。從1993年至1997年，由於空氣污染使莫斯科新生畸形兒童增加30％，兒童血液病增加50％。
Vehicle exhaust serious threat to human health. Now many big city in the world hasthe serious pollution of air, vehicle exhaust is the biggest source of pollution. Air pollution exacerbated asthma, bronchitis, lung cancer and onset of cardiovascular disease, even the man. According to statistics, there are 12500 people die fromrespiratory diseases caused by air pollution in Mexico city each year to traffic congestion; world-famous Bangkok city, dirty air contains 38 kinds of bacteria andfungi, which leads to diarrhea, blood poisoning and meningitis. The Thailand researchers report points out, it is the air pollution so that the average life expectancy than Japan, countries such as USA sixteen less seven years, Russianvehicle emissions of harmful substances is 39 times higher than the US and European countries. From 1993 to 1997, because of the air pollution that Moscowneonatal deformity children increased 30%, 50% increase in children with hematological diseases.
汽車造成的噪音也危害人類。專家們說，人的聽覺可接受的合適音量為30分貝。但現在不少城市車輛造成的噪音在70分貝以上，有些城市如開羅市中心的噪音甚至達到90分貝。這不僅會引起耳聾，還會造成神經系統紊亂和心臟病等。
The automobile caused noise is harmful to human. Experts say, the appropriatevolume of human auditory acceptable was 30 db. But now many city vehicles causenoise at 70 dB above, some city such as Cairo city noise even up to 90 db. This will not only cause deafness, still can cause disorders of the nervous system and heart disease.
所以 我認為汽車的存在弊大於利
So I think the existence of the automobile does more harm than good
『叄』 求英語二人辯論資料
這是一部分參考資料，你參考一下吧。
Your question has many different facets that is hard for me to decide exactly what you mean, however I will give you the best answer to you question that I think I can. In first discussing this issue it is important to note two people who have made a very profound way we deal with criminal and how we look at crime. The first one would be Cesare Beccaria who wrote, I can't underline so "Dei deliti e delle pene" translated (On Crimes and Punishments) which was written in 1764. He was the first to point out that crimes harm society, and that it is better to prevent crimes than to punish them. He felt that prevention could be accomplished through deterrence. He said that in order for a crime to deter someone, the punishment has to be certain, speedy, and fair in the application of punishment to fit the crime (meaning not to give them capital punishment for speeding). He felt that the later was less important than the first two, and that no matter the punishments severity if it was certain that you would get the same thing, or that you would receive some penalty every time you broke a law, and that it was fast, that would be a deterent even if the penalty was slight. He held that the severity of punishment was just and that it did hold a detterant to a certain point.
The next early reformer of the Criminal Justice, system some of whose beliefs are still followed and incorporated, is Jeremy Bentham. Without getting into as much detail his major contribution was if the pleasure you recieve outweights the percieved risks associated with getting caught or the penalty itself then the person will commit a crime. If the penalty's pain is worth more than the pleasure you will recieve you will not do the crime. Now both of these early reformers basically were sick of the way the English were using the criminal justice system and most of their work is about changing the system, and did not include any prisoners or convicts in their studies. They basically used broad terms for human behavior.
Even if it is said that they used broad terms without any investigation into actual behavior, a lot can still be said. Pavolok a classic Psycologist found that dogs can be trained to associate certain things with other things. If a dog smells food and is given food he salivates. After a while the dog salivates weather or not there is food as long as he still smells the smell. This is said to work in humans. If EVERY time a child touches a hot burner they get burned the child will automatically associate pain with touching a burner and will not touch it even when it is turned off.
Now I am going to take a direct quote from a book I am using entitled "Criminology: Explaining Crime and Its Context" written by Stephen E. Brown. "Contemporary analyses of deterrence theory also have suggested that, all things being equal, crime should decrease as punishment severity increases. Rarely, however, is all else equal. Beccaria and Betham were cautious about declaring that deterrent effects are contingent upon the severity of punishment. They clearly opposed what Zimring & Hawkings termed a FORTRESS APPROACH to punishment, an assumption that all crime can be deterred if the price exacted is great enough. The alternative STEPLADDER EFFECT, advocated by the early classicists and most contemporary neoclassicists, assumes that not all crime will be detrred and advocates that punishments should be proportionate to the harm done. Other factors might also erode the deterrent erffect of increased severity of punishment. The wide range of discretion available to police, prosecutors, and judges may be used for attenuation or elimination of punitive responses. Little is known about the effects of punishment severity, but amoung the few studies completed, most have not supported the deterrence proposition"(181).
To make things even tougher than what I have just stated is that studdies have found that "some indivals may be totally deterred by the threat of punishment, others only partially deterred, and still others not deterred at all"(183). So while the ways in which crimes are carried out has an effect on whether or not they will deter people, the indivial may also have biological or social influences that also effect how much some thing will deter him or her.
To make things even more complicated for you :o) there is also General deterrence which is what I think you are talking about and Specific deterrence. General deterrence is when some one sees or knows what happened to someone else and does not want the same fate to happen to them. Specific deterrence on the other hand is that some thing will deter them from making the same mistake next time. You could also be speaking about Absolute deterrence in which the threat is what really deters you from doing the crime. The threat of going to jail. You would not know someone personally who went to jail but you would know it is there and that it was possible to you to go there if you do that offense. This could also be what you are talking about.
It seems that the most promising evidence of deterrence is how much your social ties are effected and how strong they were in the first place. If you have a lot of family support as well as family and to other positive role models, such as a coach or pastor, who would be dissapointed in you if you did some thing bad it would almost be sufficient enough to stop you without the threat of legal sanctions. You can be shamed into not breaking the law. However there are many people who do break the law and when they get caught commit suicide because they do not want to face the stigma associated with the guilt. They did use the stock in early colonial times, where you would get tied up and people would come and laugh at you and throw rotten eggs on you or beat you. This did not completely deter crime. However you were also put there for being suspected of being a witch, so this punishment was not fair or evenly applied.
In conclusion I do not think that any form of punishment can get people to behave the way society expects them to behave. This may be e to personality disorders (Anti-social personality disorder) or the way the system actualy works (A person may say that I am never going to get caught and even if I do I will sit on death row for 10+ years before I die). So as long as there are indivial differences in the way people think, and holes to say in the criminal justice system, not everyone will be a law abiding citizen. If you made it a capital offense to speed, and caught eveyone who speed. I think that it would greatly rece the number of speeders, however you would always be putting people to death for speeding forever, someone would always try to test their luck and say it will not happen to me. Then again who wants to go through all that work and kill speeders in the first place? I hope that I answered your question, I am sorry that it is as long as a book, however I felt that was the only way I could do justice to a question that was so broad. If you feel that I have helped you please grade my response, thank you.
另一份資料
http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=10049
『肆』 英語口語的辯論
不喜歡辨論的飄過.
只要有氣勢,在說什麼,很少人會在乎.
要的是辯論時的激情,激情!
注意語音語調,注意風度~~
『伍』 英語雙人口語交際(說我的打算)
很多人認為英語口語和聽力是分開的，但是仔細一想，你就會知道，其實英語口語和聽力是密不可分的。聽力和口語是同一個環節中的不同部分，你要說，要聽得懂，你要聽了，也要學會回應，所以這兩個部分缺一不可的。練習聽力時，許多人抱怨聽不懂，因而喪失了聽的樂趣，往往半途而廢。其實，即使聽不懂也是一種學習，只不過你自己覺察不到而已。雖然暫時聽不懂，但你的耳膜已經開始嘗試著適應一種新的語言發音，你的大腦在調整頻率，准備接受一種新的信息代碼，這本身就是一次飛躍。喔 對了 我現在學的ABC天卞口語的外教才和我提過，事實上想征服英語是不難的..堅持需要個符合的研習情境及練習口語對象 最關鍵就是外教水平 最好歐美母語，口語純正才行 持續天天口語交流 1&1家教式教學才可以有更.好.的學習成果 完成課堂後同樣要重復溫習課堂音頻，好鞏固知識點！若真的是沒有人可以指導的狀況下，就去聽力室或滬江得到課余教材研習 多說、多練、多問、多聽、多讀，很快的口語就提升起來 學習效益是絕對迅速明顯的~所以切記：聽不懂時，你也在進步。練習聽力，要充分利用心理學上的無意注意，只要一有時間，就要打開錄音機播放外語磁帶，使自己處於外語的語言環境中，也許你沒聽清楚說些什麼，這不要緊，你可以隨便做其他事情，不用去有意聽，只要你的周圍有外語環境的發音，你的聽力就會提高。英語，就是被認為是鍛煉聽力和口語的最好方式了。英語的英語， 通過進行英語對話，真正提高聽力和口語，較面對面會話課，英語，只通過聲音傳遞內容上課，要求學生更高的注意力，所以對提高聽力有很大的幫助，在聽他人說話的時候，你不得不開口說話，這種學習方式是鍛煉聽力和口語的最佳方法咯
『陸』 英語口語 辯論
不喜歡辨論的飄過.
只要有氣勢,在說什麼,很少人會在乎.
要的是辯論時的激情,激情!!!
注意語音語調,注意風度~~
『柒』 高分求 大學英語口語測試二人對話 3分鍾
口語對話
1 趕時髦(go after fashion)
A: Fashion show is around the corner, I』m so excited! 時裝表演即將來臨，我很興奮！
B: Are there any good!這有什麼好的！
A: I didn't see anything wrong with the clothes; they looked pretty nice to me. I think you don』t like it! Why?我沒看出衣服有任何問題；在我看來它們都很不錯。我覺得你不喜歡！為什麼？
B: It was mb. I think it's stupid for women to wear clothes like that. 這是愚蠢的。我認為女人們穿成那樣是很愚蠢的。
A: The benevolent see benevolence and the wise see wisdom. 仁者見仁，智者見智。 B: Do you really think people can wear that stuff and walk around the streets? 你真的認為人們可以穿那種東西走在街上？
A: Yes, I do. At least, some people certainly can. They wear high-fashion clothes to show off their sense of style and wealth. 是的，我這樣認為。至少，有人一定會。他們穿著時尚的衣服展示他們的時尚感和財富。
B: Well. I still think they're mb. It makes more sense to spend the money on more practical purposes.我仍然認為他們是愚蠢的。把更多的錢花在更有意義的地方比較實際。
A: So you think it's bad if I wear it?所以你認為我穿成這樣很不好嗎？ B: If you wear it I must speak nice! 如果你穿成這樣我一定說它很好看！ A: I know you will say that.我就知道你會這樣說。 B: Only you know me!知我者非你莫屬
食品安全(food security)
A :the problems of domestic food safety are appearing constantly,And have your heard problem of oranges？ 國內食品安全問題不斷顯現，你聽說過問題橘子嗎？
B:Really?真的？
A:There are fresh citrus maggots. County on a buried 2500 kilos, and several provinces nationwide have. 有新鮮的柑橘生了蛆蟲。縣里埋了2500公斤，全國好幾個省都有這種狀況。
B: How terrible.Now the domestic food security is really bad. 多麼可怕。現在國內食品安全是非常糟糕的。
A: U.S.do better in this piont. 在這一點上美國做的更好。
B:Ah, which the United States did manage very well. What is their experience? 啊，美國確實做的很好。他們有什麼經驗？
A: the right OF FDA in the United States is power,and Very strict law enforcement. 在美國，食品葯物管理局的權利非常大，而且執法非常嚴格。 B:is there more success experience?有更多的成功經驗嗎？
A:It's a fairly standard market, no hawker stalls and food in the supermarket, food into the supermarket to go through inspection, so the food will not get home as domestic so fresh. 要有一個相當標準的市場，沒有小販的攤檔和食品在超市，食品經過超市的檢查，這樣只要食物不是很新鮮就不會被帶回家 B：How should people buy safe food?你認為人們該如何購買安全食品？ A：When we choose food, we must remember to check its tag, confirming whether the basic information is marked on it, including ingredients, procer, shelf life and particularly date of manufacture. 選擇食品時，我們一定要記住查看標簽，確認上
面是否標注基本信息，包括配料、生產廠家、保質期，尤其是生產日期。 B：Why does food contamination occur frequently these days?為什麼食品污染問題現在頻繁發生？
A：Because the food manufactures are so obsessed with making money that they lose the business ethics. They no longer take food safety as their priority.因為食品生產者惟利是圖，喪失了商業道德。他們不再把食品安全當作首要問題
飲食與健康（food and healthy）
A：Health is very important for our body.And healthy foods plays a very important role in it.So,what do you think is a healthy diet?健康對於我們的身體是十分重要的。而且健康的食物在這里扮演了一個十分重要的角色。所以，你認為什麼是健康的飲食？
B：A healthy diet should contain all the essential nutrients.健康的飲食應包含所有必需的營養物質。
A：How could people eliminate food contamination nowadays?現在人們怎樣才能杜絕食品污染事件？
B：The government should set strict rules and regulations to standardize the proction of food and punish severely those violators.政府應制定嚴格的規章制度來規范食品生產，並且嚴懲違法者。
A：Why does food contamination occur frequently these days?為什麼食品污染問題現在頻繁發生？
B：Because the food manufactures are so obsessed with making money that they lose the business ethics. They no longer take food safety as their priority.因為食品生產者惟利是圖，喪失了商業道德。他們不再把食品安全當作首要問題。
A：Why do many people suffer from heart disease recently?最近為什麼很多人患上了心臟病？
B：I suppose it is because the improved living conditions provide people with more refined grain and meat. Consequently, people have an excessive amount of fat which leads to heart disease.我認為這是由於生活條件改善，人們有了更多細糧和肉類。結果就攝入了過量的脂肪，從而引起了心臟病。 A：What』s your eating habit?你有什麼飲食習慣？
B：I have a balanced diet and I always have meals in a regular way.我飲食均衡，而且吃飯有規律。
A：How do you keep fit?你怎樣保持健康？
B：I am not particular about food and I often do exercise as long as I have free time.我不挑食，而且一有時間就會運動。
A：Do you have fast food very often?你經常吃快餐嗎？
B：No, I seldom eat fast food because it』s rich in fat. And I want to keep a slender shape.不，我幾乎不吃快餐，因為它含有很多脂肪。而我想保持苗條的體形。 A：What are the advantages of transgenic food?轉基因食品有什麼優點？ B：Transgenic technology can increase the yield of the crops and give the crops such attributes as insect-resistance or drought-resistance.轉基因技術可以提高農作物的產量，使它們具有抗病蟲、耐乾旱等特性。
A：What do you think of instant noodles? 你認為方便麵怎麼樣？
B：On the one hand, it is easy to prepare and thus brings convenience to our busy life. On the other hand, it is harmful to our health since it contains preservatives.一方面，方便麵易於准備，因此給我們忙碌的生活帶來了便利。另一方面，由於它含有防腐劑，所以對健康有害
3選一 不謝！
『捌』 英語口語考試對話，求簡單的雙人對話。兩人一共十句
A: Good morning. Do you like travelling?
B: Of course. I can broaden my horizens in travelling.
A: Where would you like to travel most now?
B: Jiuzhaigou Valley.
A: Why do you want to go there?
B: Because the scenery in Jiuzhaigou is very famous and beautiful.
A: Any other reasons?
B: You can see a lot of natural scenery, such as hills, waterfall, forest, lake, etc. In addition, you can also visit the special cultural places, for example, temple, tower, bridge, museum and cemetery.
A: Woo, It's so cool! You make me want to visit Jiuzhaigou also.
B: Oh, May be we can go there together later. We must have fun.
早上好。你喜歡旅遊嗎？
當然。旅遊可以開闊我的眼界。
那你目前想要去哪裡？
九寨溝。
為什麼你想去那裡？
因為那裡的風景很出名，而且很美。
還有其他原因嗎？
你可以看到很多自然景觀，如丘陵、瀑布、森林、湖泊等。另外，你還可以參觀一些有特殊文化的地方，例如寺廟、塔、橋、博物館及園陵。
哇，太棒了。你讓我也想去那裡旅遊一下了。
哦，那麼可能以後我們可以一起到那裡啊。我們一定會玩得很好的。
自創，希望幫到你。