考研英語閱讀短文

❶ 考研英語真題：閱讀理解

考研英語真題：閱讀理解

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK "town of culture" award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in E220m of investment and an avalache of arts, out not to be confined to cities. Britain' town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bit to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008. A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of self-celebration in its desperation to reinvent itself for, the post-Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will follow- village of culture ? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culture?

It is also wise to recall that such titles are not a cure-all. A badly run "year of culture" washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community . The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organizations. But it can be done : Glasgow' s year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A "town of culture" could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town's

peculiarities-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilities and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

21. Cooper and her colleagues argue that a "town of culture" award could________

[A] consolidate the town-city ties in Britain.

[B] promote cooperation among Britain's towns.

[C] increase the economic strength of Britain's towns.

[D] focus Britain's limited resources on cultural events.

22. According to Paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as________

[A] a sensible compromise.

[B] a self-deceiving attempt.

[C] an eye-catching bonus.

[D] an inaccessible target.

23. The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it________

[A] endeavours to maintain its image.

[B] meets the aspirations of its people.

[C] brings its local arts to prominence.

D] commits to its long-term growth.

24. Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present________

[A] a contrasting case.

[B] a supporting example.

[C] a background story,

[D] a related topic.

25. What is the author's attitude towards the proposal ?

[A] Skeptical

[B] Objective

[C] Favourable

[D] Critical

Text 2

Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money. Scientists need joumals in which to publish

their research, so they will supply the articles without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free, because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the proction of scientific knowledge.

With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only fnd a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very price sensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing instry is in an existential crisis.

The Dutch giant Elsevier, which claims to publish 25% of the scientific papers proced in the world,made profits of more than £900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than £210m in 2016 toenable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate efforts to change them.

The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012, which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accessed, shows the legal ecosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.

In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms: either freely available from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.

Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities. Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their proct free to readers by charging their writers fees to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around ￡500 to $5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these’’article preparation costs’’ had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation. In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status, while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places. In both cases, we need a rebalancing of power.

26. Scientific publishing is seen as“a licence to print money" partly because________

[A] its funding has enjoyed a steady increase .

[B] its marketing strategy has been successful.

[C] its payment for peer review is reced.

[D] its content acquisition costs nothing.

27. According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, scientific publishers Elsevier have________

[A] thrived mainly on university libraries.

[B] gone through an existential crisis.

[C] revived the publishing instry.

[D] financed researchers generously.

28. How does the author feel about the success of Sci-Hub?

[A] Relieved.

[B] Puzzled.

[C] Concerned

[D] Encouraged.

29. It can be learned from Paragraphs 5 and 6 that open access terms________

[A]allow publishers some room to make money.

[B] render publishing much easier for scientists.

[C] rece the cost of publication substantially.

[D] free universities from financial burdens.

30. Which of the following characterises the scientific publishing model?

[A] Trial subscription is offered.

[B] Labour triumphs over status.

[C] Costs are well controlled.

D] The few feed on the many.

Text 3

Progressives often support diversity mandates as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too often such policies are an insincere form of virtue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does little to help average people.

A pair of bills sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure "gender parity" on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.

Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government boards are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing government quotas. If the bills become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.

The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in Califomia, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. In signing the measure, California Governor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which expressly classifies people on the basis of sex, is probably unconstitutional.

The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classifications unless they are designed to address an "important" policy interest, Because the California law applies to all boards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constitutional guarantee of "equal protection".

But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currently mirror the pereentage of women in the general population, but so what?

The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing without government interference. According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.

Requiring companies to make gender the primary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide corporate gender quota.

Wrting in The New Republic, Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a"golden skirt "phenomenon, where the same clite women scoop up multiple seats on a variety of boards.

Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity, remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do litle to help average women.

31. The author believes that the bills sponsored by Lewis and Haddad wills________

[A] help little to rece gender bias.

[B] pose a threat to the state government.

[C] raise women's position in politics.

[D] greatly broaden career options.

32. Which of the following is true of the California measure?

[A] It has irritated private business owners.

[B] It is welcomed by the Supreme Court,

[C] It may go against the Constitution.

[D] It will settle the prior controversies.

33. The author mentions the study by Catalyst to ilustrate____

[A] the harm from arbitrary board decision.

[B] the importance of constitutional guaranees.

[C] the pressure on women in global corporations.

[D] the needlessness of government interventions.

34. Norway's adoption of a nationwide corporate gender quota has led to____

[A] the underestimation of elite women's role.

[B] the objection to female participation on boards.

[C] the entry of unqualified candidates into the board.

[D] the growing tension between labor and management.

35. Which of the following can be inferred from the text?

[A] Women's need in employment should be considered.

[B] Feasibility should be a prime concern in policymaking.

[C] Everyone should try hard to promote social justice.

[D] Major social issues should be the focus of legislation.

Text 4

Last Thursday, the French Senate passed a digital services tax, which would impose an entirely new tax

on large multinationals that provide digital services to consumers or users in France. Digital services include everything from providing a platform for selling goods and services online to targeting advertising based on user data, and the tax applies to gross revenue from such servces. Many French politicians and media outlets have referred to this as a“GAFA tax," meaning that it is designed to apply primarily to companies such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon- in other words, multiational tech companies based in the United States.

The digital services tax now awaits the signature of President Emmanuel Macron, who has expressed support for the measure, and it could go into effect within the next few weeks. But it has already sparked significant controversy, with the Unite Sates trade representative opening an investigation into whether the tax discriminates against American companies, which in turn could lead to trade sanctions against France.

The French tax is not just a unilateral move by one country in need of revenue. Instead, the digital services tax is part of a much larger trend, with countries over the past few years proposing or putting in place an alphabet soup of new international tax provisions. These have included Britain's DPT (diverted profits tax), Australia's MAAL (multinational antiavoidance law), and India's SEP (significant economic presence) test, to name but a few. At the same time, the European Union, Spain, Britain and several other countries have all seriously contemplated digital services taxes.

These unilateral developments differ in their specifics, but they are all designed to tax multinationals on income and revenue that countries believe they should have a right to tax, even if international tax rules do not grant them that right. In other words, they all share a view that the international tax system has failed to keep ;up with the current economy.

In response to these many unilateral measures, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) is currently working with 131 countries to reach a consensus by the end of 2020 on an international solution. Both France and the United States are involved in the organization' s work, but France's digital services tax and the American response raise questions about what the future holds for the international tax system.

France‘s planned tax is a clear warning: Unless a broad consensus can be reached on reforming the international tax system, other nations are likely to follow suit, and American companies will face a cascade of different taxes from dozens of nations that will prove burdensome and costly.

36. The French Senate has passed a bill to_____

[A] regulate digital services platforms.

[B] protect French companies' interests .

[C] impose a levy on tech multinationals.

[D] curb the influence of advertising.

37. It can be learned from Paragraph 2 that the digital services tax _____

[A] may trigger countermeasures against France.

[B] is apt to arouse criticism at home and abroad.

[C] aims to ease international trade tensions.

[D] will prompt the tech giants to quit France.

38. The countries adopting the unilateral measures share the opinion that _____

[A] redistribution of tech giants' revenue must be ensured.

[B] the current international tax system needs upgrading.

[C] tech multinationals' monopoly should be prevented.

[D] all countries ought to enjoy equal taxing rights.

39. It can be learned from Para 5 that the OECO's current work_____

[A] is being resisted by US companies.

[B] needs to be readjusted immediately.

[C] is faced with uncertain prospects.

[D] needs to in involve more countries.

40. Which of the following might be the. best title for this text?

[A] France Is Confronted with Trade Sanctions

[B] France leads the charge on Digital Tax

[C] France Says "NO" to Tech Multinationals

[D] France Demands a Role in the Digital Economy

考研英語真題：閱讀理解的內容小編就說到這里了，更多關於考研備考技巧，報名入口，報名時間，考研成績查詢，報名費用，准考證列印入口及時間等問題，小編會及時更新。希望各位考生都能進入自己的理想考研院校。希望大家能好好復習。取得佳績。

❷ 考研英語閱讀理解考查題型有哪些

閱讀理解A(一般閱讀理解，從小到大做的那種)，4篇
40分
閱讀理解B（近幾年來一直是七選五，超難）
10分
閱讀理解C（翻譯
英譯漢五個
）
10分

❸ 考研英語閱讀理解一般平均幾分鍾一篇啊

考研英語一共3個小時，閱讀4篇單選的那種，平均一篇18-20分鍾左右。 不過閱讀佔分比挺高的，可以把其他的做快點，閱讀多留點時間。
希望對你有幫助

❹ 考研英語試卷中閱讀文章都是出自哪裡

根據數據統計，80%的考研英語閱讀來源於《經濟學人》、《衛報》、《自然雜志》、《新聞周刊》、《科學美國人》等。偶爾也會在一些書籍中尋找合適的文字做考試素材，但不多見，尤其是這幾年已經很難見到。

其中社會科學是考研英語閱讀的主要和重點選材，自然科學一直保持在 1 篇文章左右的分量，人文科學的重要性則有上升的趨勢。

(4)考研英語閱讀短文擴展閱讀：

考研英語閱讀文章內容分析

從體裁上看，大綱要求考生能夠順利讀懂四類文章，分別為議論文、說明文、記敘文和應用文。不過，考研閱讀理解的文章大多為說明文或者議論文。針對這兩類文章，應該有不同的閱讀重點和策略。

另外在絕大多數情況下，歷年真題的文章來源一般控制在過去的5年之內，即倘若2007年參加考研的話，2007年的文章一般來自於2001年到2006年之間的報刊雜志上。

但近五年的真題來源有所改變，一般選自過去兩年內的雜志，甚至一年內的居多，可見文章的時效性越來越明顯，所以閱讀的范圍也就小了很多。

英語閱讀真題文章一般字數上控制在450字到550字之間，段落上一般控制在3到6個段落。所以可以把精力主要集中在符合前面字數、段落以及年份的文章來進行復習和閱讀，如此一來就把復習的范圍大為減少了。

❺ 考研英語閱讀怎麼復習，現在明白還不晚

1.難詞，難句的梳理
所謂的難詞難句對於不同的學生來講，內容將是不同的。但所指的就是在前期做的過程中影響到閱讀，影響到理解，和影響到題目正確率的所有的字詞句。尤其是高頻的，常考的詞與重點語法結構，以及題目過程中自己做錯的原因。
2.題目的梳理
在所有的題目中，按照題型分類，主旨題，例證題，推斷題，詞彙題，觀點態度題分別有著怎樣的解題思路和注意事項。
比如：選項當中有一種錯誤選項的典型特點是：比較結構的出現。每當碰到的時候要多加小心，因為通常情況下原文並沒有涉及到兩者之間的比較，但是選項卻出現了，並且這種考察方式是及其不容易察覺的，所以要多加小心。但是任何說法都不會是絕對的，關鍵得看原文細節到底有無涉及。
對於那些閱讀理解一直穩定在每篇錯兩到三個題目的同學
想要突破，想要提高，每天只是機械的重復做題並沒有什麼用，重要的是要分析做錯的每一道題，找到自己出錯的根本原因。
首先歸納下，你什麼類型的題目總做錯，做錯的原因是什麼?是分不清題型、不知道如何定位?還是定位句子看不明白?或者是定位句子看得懂，可是和四個選項比對時建立不起來和正確選項之間的邏輯關聯，看不出來定位句子和選項之間的必然聯系?
只有知道具體問題出在哪，才能更接近解決問題的本質，才能提高，分析出自己的問題。那麼就有針對性的練習，提高自己薄弱的環節，哪個環節薄弱就練哪裡。其實，更多的考生是出在最後一個環節，就是定位句子和正確選項之間聯系不起來，往往四個選項排除兩個，剩下兩個糾結的，然後就選錯了，那麼現在教你一招：拿出真題，別的不幹，就分析定位句子和正確選項之間的關聯，再分析下讓你特別糾結的那個選項到底為什麼不對，錯在哪裡，如何干擾你的，認真分析之後一定有提高!
對那些覺得閱讀真題都記得答案的同學。
有同學說，真題都看了好幾遍了，每道題的答案都知道是哪一個，也知道在文章中的定位在哪裡，不知道再看還要看什麼。
當你第一遍做真題時，你的側重點往往在於對文章內容和句子意思的理解，做題時也往往是一道題做完基本所對應的那一段都看差不多了，也就是說基本是按照自己的傳統方法做的，這樣一篇文章坐下來應該不止18分鍾吧?
但是第二遍做真題，因為有了第一遍對於文章內容的了解，你的重心就應該有所改變，重點應該放在後面的五道題目上來，認真分析每道題目類型，然後按照題目類型和題干關鍵詞看看，不用像第一遍做題時看那麼多句話，只找到一到兩句精準的定位句子就把題目解出來。
做第三遍的時候，再站在一個更宏觀的角度觀察下，每道題目所涉及到的定位句子在每個段落裡面的什麼位置，有什麼特點，比如位於段首、段尾、還是長難句?再看看，每篇文章的主旨句和每道題正確選項之間有什麼聯系?其實就是找找規律，摸索出點兒門道，比如揣摩下命題人一般把考點設置在哪個位置等等。只有這樣一層層的剝洋蔥似的看閱讀真題，才能避免只見樹木不見森林盲目式的閱讀，才能快速提高閱讀部分的成績。

❻ 考研英語總共幾篇閱讀啊

考研英語一共四篇閱讀理解，共約1600詞，題目是四選一。

具體題型如下

考研英語一試題分三部分，共52題，包括英語知識運用、閱讀理解和寫作。 第一部分 英語知識運用

該部分不僅考查考生對不同語境中規范的語言要素（包括詞彙、表達方式和結構）的掌握程度，而且還考查考生對語段特徵（如連貫性和一致性等）的辨識能力等。共20小題，每小題0.5分，共10分。

在一篇240~280詞的文章中留出20個空白，要求考生從每題給出的4個選項中選出最佳答案，使補全後的文章意思通順、前後連貫、結構完整。考生在答題卡1上作答。 第二部分 閱讀理解

該部分由A、B、C三節組成，考查考生理解書面英語的能力。共30小題，每小題2分，共60分。

A節（20小題）：主要考查考生理解主旨要義、具體信息、概念性含義，進行有關的判斷、推理和引申，根據上下文推測生詞的詞義等能力。要求考生根據所提供的4篇（總長度約為1 600詞）文章的內容，從每題所給出的4個選項中選出最佳答案。考生在答題卡1上作答。

B節（5小題）：主要考查考生對諸如連貫性、一致性等語段特徵以及文章結構的理解。本部分有3種備選題型。每次考試從這3種備選題型中選擇一種進行考查。考生在答題卡1上作答。 備選題型有：

1）本部分的內容是一篇總長度為500~600詞的文章，其中有5段空白，文章後有6~7段文字。要求考生根據文章內容從這6~7段文字中選擇能分別放進文章中5個空白處的5段。

2）在一篇長度約500~600詞的文章中，各段落的原有順序已被打亂。要求考生根據文章的內容和結構將所列段落（7~8個）重新排序，其中有2~3個段落在文章中的位置已經給出。

3）在一篇長度約500詞的文章前或後有6~7段文字或6~7個概括句或小標題。這些文字或標題分別是對文章中某一部分的概括、闡述或舉例。要求考生根據文章內容，從這6~7個選項中選出最恰當的5段文字或5個標題填入文章的空白處。

C節（5小題）*：主要考查考生准確理解概念或結構較復雜的英語文字材料的能力。要求考生閱讀一篇約400詞的文章，並將其中5個畫線部分（約150詞）譯成漢語，要求譯文准確、完整、通順。考生在答題卡2上作答。 第三部分 寫作

該部分由A、B兩節組成，主要考查考生的書面表達能力。共30分。 A節：

考生根據所給情景寫出約100詞（標點符號不計算在內）的應用性短文，包括私人和公務信函、備忘錄、報告等。

考生在答題卡2上作答。共10分。

B節：考生根據提示信息寫出一篇160~200詞的短文（標點符號不計算在內）。提示信息的形式有主題句、寫作提綱、規定情景、圖、表等。考生在答題卡2上作答。共20分。 *碩士研究生入學考試將英譯漢試題作為閱讀理解的一部分，其目的是測試考生根據上下文准確理解概念或復雜結構並用漢語正確予以表達的能力。

❼ 考研英語閱讀理解錯的太多了，怎麼辦

四六級通過的話，說明基礎是可以的！
前期不熟悉題型，錯2-3個很正常版，因為考研英權語和四六級的出題角度和答題邏輯都是不一樣的。
考研英語的閱讀更考察你提取信息，領會信息的能力，因此對定位、詞彙的一詞多義和同義替換這幾點比較側重。
好好總結錯題原因，學習閱讀技巧，後期成績會上去的！