2013考研英語一閱讀4

㈠ 2013年考研英語一閱讀新題型答案

英語卷子有很多套，就是所謂的一題多卷，完型、閱讀、新題型都是的
就是題目是一樣專的但是選屬項的順序不一樣，可能你的A項在我的卷子上是D項，就是為了防止作弊
所以網上的卷子只是某一個版本
不信你打開不同機構提供的真題卷子對比一下就知道了

㈡ 急問，2013考研英語一難度

個人英語四級593，六級490，都是一次考過的，雖然考研和四六級不一樣，但至少可以專說明我英語還算屬可以的，但這次我的英語閱讀至少錯了8個，新題型十幾分鍾做完對了一個，翻譯我直接寫不出來。作文算是適中，我也沒有背模板。這次我只祈求過線就行了。

㈢ 求助 關於考研英語一真題2013年text4

Text 4
a five to three vote,the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona's immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Aministration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the federal government and the states.
An arizona.United States,the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona's controversial plan to have state and local police enfour federal immigrations law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to "establish a uniform Rule of Anturalization" and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial.Arizona had attempted to fashion state police that ran to the existing federal ones.
Justice Anthony Kennedy,joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court's liberals,ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun .On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately "occupied the field " and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal's privileged powers
However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That』s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.
Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute. The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.
The 8-0 objection to President Obama tures on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as 「a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power」. The White House argued tha Arizona』s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities, even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter. In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with.
Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government,and control of citizenship and the borders is among them. But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status,it could.It could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn't want to carry out Congress's immigration wishes,no state should be allowed to do so either.Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim.
36. Three provisions of Arizona』s plan were overturned because they
[A] deprived the federal police of Constitutional powers.
[B] disturbed the power balance between different states.
[C] overstepped the authority of federal immigration law.
[D] contradicted both the federal and state policies.
37. On which of the following did the Justices agree,according to Paragraph4?
[A] Federal officers』 ty to withhold immigrants』information.
[B] States』 independence from federal immigration law.
[C] States』 legitimate role in immigration enforcement.
[D] Congress』s intervention in immigration enforcement.
38. It can be inferred from Paragraph 5 that the Alien and Sedition Acts
[A] violated the Constitution.
[B] undermined the states』 interests.
[C] supported the federal statute.
[D] stood in favor of the states.
39. The White House claims that its power of enforcement
[A] outweighs that held by the states.
[B] is dependent on the states』 support.
[C] is established by federal statutes.
[D] rarely goes against state laws.
40. What can be learned from the last paragraph?
[A] Immigration issues are usually decided by Congress.
[B] Justices intended to check the power of the Administrstion.
[C] Justices wanted to strengthen its coordination with Congress.
[D] The Administration is dominant over immigration issues.

㈣ 2013年考研英語英一閱讀部分難度系數多少

不清楚，應該是最高的，分享個視頻
2014 考研英語一閱讀分析（一）文章來源版
http://my.tv.sohu.com/us/231057940/74386390.shtml
2014 考研英語一閱讀分權析（二）獲得信息

㈤ 2013考研英語一難度如何

這個問題可以說是因人而異，大部分人認為考研難在單詞量和語法，其實，這不是單詞量和語法的問題。對於過了專八，和六級拿高分的同學來說，單詞量和語法早已不是問題。專八單詞12000個，考研5500個，六級5000個。而語法，只要高中讀完，就幾乎再沒有新的語法了。至於熟詞僻意，在考研中的確有，但只佔少數，對於考生的威脅也不形成氣候。

考研英語真正的難點在於陷阱!

這在四六級，專四專八中是幾乎絕跡的。但是考研的客觀題，即，完型，閱讀，新題型中都充斥著陷阱。比如，閱讀中：偷換概念，以偏概全，無中生有，擴大范圍等等。

在此，淺談一下完型。出題者在完形中，使過的一類最簡單的小貓膩。

例如：在08年的11題中，(注意：請讀者先看一個選項，判斷它的意思，然後再往下讀)選項D.
unaccountably。很多考生把這個單詞理解為：無數的。結果帶入特別通順，結果答錯，失分。殊不知，上了出題者的當，這個單詞應該是：無法解釋地。注意此詞的詞根為：account
作為動詞表示：解釋，而不是count 作為動詞表示，數數。這是高中詞彙表中的一個單詞。在此處，出題者就指望考生把這個單詞看錯為：無數的，然後帶回去答錯。

此處是完型干擾項的一種設置：稱作：詞形干擾。說白了就是障眼法。

最近十年類似明顯的障眼法還有三處，分別是：

02年的38題，選項D. effected。這是一個根本不存在的單詞，注意effect是名詞，affect是其動詞形式，其後才能加ed。

03年的31題，選項C. personnel，有人誤讀為：私人的，實為：人事的;

同樣03年的31題，選項D. corporation，有人誤讀為：合作，實為：公司;

異常巧妙的是：如果選項C. personnel 誤認為：私人的，即與該題選項B. indivial，個人的，形成近義詞辨析;而如果選項D.
corporation誤讀為合作，即與該題選項A.
group，群體的，形成近義詞辨析。出題者的干擾項設置可不是沒有道理的、任意的，此處，03年的出題者可謂把詞形辨析玩到了極致!

由此可見，如果考生們不知考研英語本質(陷阱)的話，可能這個瓶頸就很難逾越。因此，考生如果一個勁只顧復習而不好好分析的話，很有可能就是在南轅北轍。

㈥ 2013年考研英語閱讀加新題型錯十個，完型拿4分，翻譯沒戲估計拿多少分。

完型減去16分，翻譯減去15分，錯10個減去20分，這樣的話，49分。

也許不對。

㈦ 請問誰有2003年到2013年考研英語的閱讀和閱讀譯文真題啊~緊急求啊。

http://wenku..com/link?url=5XPuc1nZO1iVqqLxZVQuTMGqO_SVbOMUSwq&rt=1&rt=1

㈧ 考研英語的4篇閱讀難度有差別嗎

沒有什麼差別。
考核的東西不一樣，所以對不同的人有不同的難度感受了。

㈨ 2013年英語一閱讀text4是不是太難了點兒

2013年英復語一閱讀text4確實是非常難制了。

每年考試過後8月份或9月份公布成績並頒發成績單，根據教育部規定四六級考試不設置及格線，四級425分（含425分）以上可以報考六級，所以大家普遍認為四六級的合格線為425分。

英語四六級的分數是排位分，沒有總分。報名時間CET全國英語四六級考試的考試時間為：每年6月份、12月份（每年時間略有不同）。

2019年1月15日，中國教育部考試中心與英國文化教育協會在京聯合發布雅思、普思考試與中國英語能力等級量表對接研究結果。雅思聽力得5分，即達到中國英語能力等級量表四級水平。

㈩ 考研英語閱讀13年真題閱讀錯了四個 14年錯了12個 怎麼辦太不穩定了

接著做，做到穩定為止。
你是不是背景知識偏科啊？整理一下哪些背景的文章容易做錯，相應的補充一下。