考研英語一閱讀資源

① 考研英語一一篇閱讀多少時間

十分鍾左右吧，如果超過十分鍾建議先做個記號，然後隨便選一個答案後跳過，如果後面有時間的話在回來看一看。

② 考研英語一閱讀第一遍怎麼搞

當作翻譯題做 每一個單詞都明確意思 選擇題明確答案出處

③ 求考研英語一的歷年真題及解析的百度雲！！！如果能到2019年最好！謝謝(*°∀°)=3

9月參加雅思考試的勇士們 首要面對的一大難題就是：

雅思口語新題！

打call 打call 打call

領取方式

獲取完整PDF版請關注「北京朗閣培訓中心」微信公眾號，添加朗閣小秘書為好友，回復「口語」，即可免費領取！

④ 考研英語誰閱讀講的好求介紹一下

"如果是網課的話，可以聽下張國靜考研英語全程班，裡面詞彙、語法、真題、作文都會講到，閱讀也講的很詳細。書就用《考研真相》，一詞一句的精解很適合基礎不太好的。
"

⑤ 一篇考研英語（一）閱讀做多久合適

考研閱讀像大家說的，每篇必須控制在15分鍾，四篇就1小時了。完形一般在專20分鍾以內，最後做因為得屬分率超低，全國平均分不到5分好么。
建議你平時的閱讀訓練使用真題，著重訓練如何速度判斷閱讀的上下文邏輯和句子結構，剛開始訓練容易超時很正常，一定要一篇真題閱讀反復剖析個三五遍，直到完全掌握，並做對全部選擇題，才能有實質的效果，別做完就丟一邊。

⑥ 考研英語一閱讀哪個老師講的好

網上找 商志
他講閱讀理解我覺得是非常不錯的，方法很好，很有必要聽一聽他關內於做閱讀理解的方法。容
剩下的就是做張劍的黃皮書150篇，按照商志的方法去做150篇閱讀，一天分析一篇，或者兩篇（時間足夠的話），然後後期就是做真題，兩遍以上。
閱讀要一直做，一直做，做到考研的前一天。保持這樣一種做題的感覺很重要，不要在意做一篇5道錯4個或者3個，沒關系，真的，對於考研英語來講錯多少都是正常的，所以，你只要要相信自己，一直堅持做，保持做題的這種感覺，一直到考研的那天就足夠了。其餘的都不要去管，也不要去想。
另外，做題一定要卡時間，切記切記！
祝你考研順利！

⑦ 考研英語真題：閱讀理解

考研英語真題：閱讀理解

Text 1

A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK "town of culture" award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in E220m of investment and an avalache of arts, out not to be confined to cities. Britain' town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bit to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.

Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008. A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of self-celebration in its desperation to reinvent itself for, the post-Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will follow- village of culture ? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culture?

It is also wise to recall that such titles are not a cure-all. A badly run "year of culture" washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community . The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.

It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organizations. But it can be done : Glasgow' s year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.

A "town of culture" could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town's

peculiarities-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilities and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.

21. Cooper and her colleagues argue that a "town of culture" award could________

[A] consolidate the town-city ties in Britain.

[B] promote cooperation among Britain's towns.

[C] increase the economic strength of Britain's towns.

[D] focus Britain's limited resources on cultural events.

22. According to Paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as________

[A] a sensible compromise.

[B] a self-deceiving attempt.

[C] an eye-catching bonus.

[D] an inaccessible target.

23. The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it________

[A] endeavours to maintain its image.

[B] meets the aspirations of its people.

[C] brings its local arts to prominence.

D] commits to its long-term growth.

24. Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present________

[A] a contrasting case.

[B] a supporting example.

[C] a background story,

[D] a related topic.

25. What is the author's attitude towards the proposal ?

[A] Skeptical

[B] Objective

[C] Favourable

[D] Critical

Text 2

Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money. Scientists need joumals in which to publish

their research, so they will supply the articles without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free, because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the proction of scientific knowledge.

With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only fnd a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very price sensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing instry is in an existential crisis.

The Dutch giant Elsevier, which claims to publish 25% of the scientific papers proced in the world,made profits of more than £900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than £210m in 2016 toenable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate efforts to change them.

The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012, which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accessed, shows the legal ecosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.

In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms: either freely available from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.

Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities. Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their proct free to readers by charging their writers fees to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around ￡500 to $5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these’’article preparation costs’’ had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation. In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status, while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places. In both cases, we need a rebalancing of power.

26. Scientific publishing is seen as“a licence to print money" partly because________

[A] its funding has enjoyed a steady increase .

[B] its marketing strategy has been successful.

[C] its payment for peer review is reced.

[D] its content acquisition costs nothing.

27. According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, scientific publishers Elsevier have________

[A] thrived mainly on university libraries.

[B] gone through an existential crisis.

[C] revived the publishing instry.

[D] financed researchers generously.

28. How does the author feel about the success of Sci-Hub?

[A] Relieved.

[B] Puzzled.

[C] Concerned

[D] Encouraged.

29. It can be learned from Paragraphs 5 and 6 that open access terms________

[A]allow publishers some room to make money.

[B] render publishing much easier for scientists.

[C] rece the cost of publication substantially.

[D] free universities from financial burdens.

30. Which of the following characterises the scientific publishing model?

[A] Trial subscription is offered.

[B] Labour triumphs over status.

[C] Costs are well controlled.

D] The few feed on the many.

Text 3

Progressives often support diversity mandates as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too often such policies are an insincere form of virtue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does little to help average people.

A pair of bills sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure "gender parity" on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.

Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government boards are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing government quotas. If the bills become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.

The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in Califomia, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. In signing the measure, California Governor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which expressly classifies people on the basis of sex, is probably unconstitutional.

The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classifications unless they are designed to address an "important" policy interest, Because the California law applies to all boards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constitutional guarantee of "equal protection".

But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currently mirror the pereentage of women in the general population, but so what?

The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing without government interference. According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.

Requiring companies to make gender the primary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide corporate gender quota.

Wrting in The New Republic, Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a"golden skirt "phenomenon, where the same clite women scoop up multiple seats on a variety of boards.

Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity, remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do litle to help average women.

31. The author believes that the bills sponsored by Lewis and Haddad wills________

[A] help little to rece gender bias.

[B] pose a threat to the state government.

[C] raise women's position in politics.

[D] greatly broaden career options.

32. Which of the following is true of the California measure?

[A] It has irritated private business owners.

[B] It is welcomed by the Supreme Court,

[C] It may go against the Constitution.

[D] It will settle the prior controversies.

33. The author mentions the study by Catalyst to ilustrate____

[A] the harm from arbitrary board decision.

[B] the importance of constitutional guaranees.

[C] the pressure on women in global corporations.

[D] the needlessness of government interventions.

34. Norway's adoption of a nationwide corporate gender quota has led to____

[A] the underestimation of elite women's role.

[B] the objection to female participation on boards.

[C] the entry of unqualified candidates into the board.

[D] the growing tension between labor and management.

35. Which of the following can be inferred from the text?

[A] Women's need in employment should be considered.

[B] Feasibility should be a prime concern in policymaking.

[C] Everyone should try hard to promote social justice.

[D] Major social issues should be the focus of legislation.

Text 4

Last Thursday, the French Senate passed a digital services tax, which would impose an entirely new tax

on large multinationals that provide digital services to consumers or users in France. Digital services include everything from providing a platform for selling goods and services online to targeting advertising based on user data, and the tax applies to gross revenue from such servces. Many French politicians and media outlets have referred to this as a“GAFA tax," meaning that it is designed to apply primarily to companies such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon- in other words, multiational tech companies based in the United States.

The digital services tax now awaits the signature of President Emmanuel Macron, who has expressed support for the measure, and it could go into effect within the next few weeks. But it has already sparked significant controversy, with the Unite Sates trade representative opening an investigation into whether the tax discriminates against American companies, which in turn could lead to trade sanctions against France.

The French tax is not just a unilateral move by one country in need of revenue. Instead, the digital services tax is part of a much larger trend, with countries over the past few years proposing or putting in place an alphabet soup of new international tax provisions. These have included Britain's DPT (diverted profits tax), Australia's MAAL (multinational antiavoidance law), and India's SEP (significant economic presence) test, to name but a few. At the same time, the European Union, Spain, Britain and several other countries have all seriously contemplated digital services taxes.

These unilateral developments differ in their specifics, but they are all designed to tax multinationals on income and revenue that countries believe they should have a right to tax, even if international tax rules do not grant them that right. In other words, they all share a view that the international tax system has failed to keep ;up with the current economy.

In response to these many unilateral measures, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) is currently working with 131 countries to reach a consensus by the end of 2020 on an international solution. Both France and the United States are involved in the organization' s work, but France's digital services tax and the American response raise questions about what the future holds for the international tax system.

France‘s planned tax is a clear warning: Unless a broad consensus can be reached on reforming the international tax system, other nations are likely to follow suit, and American companies will face a cascade of different taxes from dozens of nations that will prove burdensome and costly.

36. The French Senate has passed a bill to_____

[A] regulate digital services platforms.

[B] protect French companies' interests .

[C] impose a levy on tech multinationals.

[D] curb the influence of advertising.

37. It can be learned from Paragraph 2 that the digital services tax _____

[A] may trigger countermeasures against France.

[B] is apt to arouse criticism at home and abroad.

[C] aims to ease international trade tensions.

[D] will prompt the tech giants to quit France.

38. The countries adopting the unilateral measures share the opinion that _____

[A] redistribution of tech giants' revenue must be ensured.

[B] the current international tax system needs upgrading.

[C] tech multinationals' monopoly should be prevented.

[D] all countries ought to enjoy equal taxing rights.

39. It can be learned from Para 5 that the OECO's current work_____

[A] is being resisted by US companies.

[B] needs to be readjusted immediately.

[C] is faced with uncertain prospects.

[D] needs to in involve more countries.

40. Which of the following might be the. best title for this text?

[A] France Is Confronted with Trade Sanctions

[B] France leads the charge on Digital Tax

[C] France Says "NO" to Tech Multinationals

[D] France Demands a Role in the Digital Economy

考研英語真題：閱讀理解的內容小編就說到這里了，更多關於考研備考技巧，報名入口，報名時間，考研成績查詢，報名費用，准考證列印入口及時間等問題，小編會及時更新。希望各位考生都能進入自己的理想考研院校。希望大家能好好復習。取得佳績。

⑧ 求考研英語一歷年真題及解析答案的電子版！！！可以百度網盤分享一下嗎謝謝！

你好，來我是大大大大源魚兒，用網路網盤分享給你，點開就可以保存，鏈接永久有效^_^鏈接: https://pan..com/s/1R8wi140gQ5XO7cekf1338A 提取碼: 22vt

⑨ 考研英語試卷中閱讀文章都是出自哪裡

根據數據統計，80%的考研英語閱讀來源於《經濟學人》、《衛報》、《自然雜志》、《新聞周刊》、《科學美國人》等。偶爾也會在一些書籍中尋找合適的文字做考試素材，但不多見，尤其是這幾年已經很難見到。

其中社會科學是考研英語閱讀的主要和重點選材，自然科學一直保持在 1 篇文章左右的分量，人文科學的重要性則有上升的趨勢。

(9)考研英語一閱讀資源擴展閱讀：

考研英語閱讀文章內容分析

從體裁上看，大綱要求考生能夠順利讀懂四類文章，分別為議論文、說明文、記敘文和應用文。不過，考研閱讀理解的文章大多為說明文或者議論文。針對這兩類文章，應該有不同的閱讀重點和策略。

另外在絕大多數情況下，歷年真題的文章來源一般控制在過去的5年之內，即倘若2007年參加考研的話，2007年的文章一般來自於2001年到2006年之間的報刊雜志上。

但近五年的真題來源有所改變，一般選自過去兩年內的雜志，甚至一年內的居多，可見文章的時效性越來越明顯，所以閱讀的范圍也就小了很多。

英語閱讀真題文章一般字數上控制在450字到550字之間，段落上一般控制在3到6個段落。所以可以把精力主要集中在符合前面字數、段落以及年份的文章來進行復習和閱讀，如此一來就把復習的范圍大為減少了。

⑩ 考研英語一閱讀怎麼做

說到考研英語閱讀理解，那就只能靠平時的練習了，在這個過程中，你要時時總結，縱深對比，千萬不要陷入題海戰術只做題，不總結的誤區當中。在做題的過程中，你把各種體型都總結了一遍，且對於各種題型的答案標志和陷阱標志都有較深的了解，這樣一來，你不但積累了豐富的經驗，而且你還提升了自己的閱讀速度，一舉兩得，所以做題是很重要的！對於閱讀，我個人感覺是，純粹是個人經驗積累多少的問題，只有保證一定的練習量，你才能用質的提高！
下面 啟道考研 給你個人建議：做閱讀題有兩種常規的方式：問題---短文----問題，或者短文---問題----短文。
對於廣告類，通知類的文章，尤其是那種有小標題的文章，更適宜採用「問題---短文----問題」的做題模式，因為這類文章一般都是考察細節題，看完選項之後，可以直接回到原文去找，這樣可以節省很多時間，而且命中率也高，一舉兩得，何樂不為呢？
對於社科類，人文類，社會哲學類的文章，則適合採用「短文---問題----短文」的做題方式，這樣做的好處是：第一，先快速通讀一遍文章之後，能較全面地把握文章的主旨以及行文思路；第二，如果先看問題（或者問題及選項一並看），盡管可以知道文章的某些細節，但可能會因為這些細枝末節，對把握全文主題造成以偏概全的錯誤，而且隨著閱讀文章的深入，也許整個思路都會亂掉，這樣一亂的話，就只能再回到原文進行閱讀，一而再，再而三地閱讀會使得思路紊亂最大化，費時費力，事倍功半！