㈠ 求英語辯論稿
誰說合理？
㈡ 英語辯論稿：（競爭是一種有效的教與學的方法。）
Competition is a common phenomenon in our society . We compete when we play games, we try to do better than others in our study, and there is constant competition for jobs, fame, wealth and so forth. Therefore,we can say that, in a certain sense, competition is one of the motive forces of the development of our modern society.
It is often believed, that competition and cooperation are in opposition to each other. Some people stress competition, without which, in their eyes, there is no responsibility, no drive and ultimately, no progress. Others advocate cooperation whatever they do. They are of the opinion that the dependence of people on one another has increased, without which the society we live in can not keep going smoothly. In reality, we find that in many cases competition goes hand in hand with cooperation. Lets take a football game for example. During the game, one team is competing against the other, but each member of the team must cooperate with his teammates. Otherwise, they would lose the game no matter how skillful each indivial player might be. It is clear that competition has much to do with cooperation.
As far as I'm concerned, I do not agree with the view that competition and cooperation are always in conflict with each other. In my opinion, while advocating competition. We should never forget cooperation. In our social life, cooperation is especially necessary because most work is fulfilled with or through other people. So Ive come to the conclusion that competition are equally important.
僅供你參考。
㈢ 這樣寫英文辯論賽正方一辯的稿詞
克隆利弊爭論比較大的就是倫理問題
作為正方可以迴避倫理問題，抓住治療科研方面突破，攻擊對方弱點，讓其無還手之機。
To clone or not to clone, is that the question?
Advanced technology has already pushed human being to edges,such as the proction of weapons of mass destruction,the destruction of Ozone by Freon ,and the application of clone.The heated deabte over whether cloning technique should be used in human reproc--
tion must be considered as a serious issue.
Clone, to a certain degree, is beneficial to mankind.Such disease as Parkinsons will possiblly be cured in the future in the hope of further applying of clone.However,the abuse of this technology will bring human being unthinkable destruction.
Since the declaration of the death of Dolly,we are more conscious of the inefficient procere of clone.Acorrding to "Dolly's false legacy",the incidence of death among fetuses and offspring proced by cloning is much higher than it is through natural reproction--roughly 10 times as high as normal before birth and 3 times as high after birth.And even you may argue that this technology will be perfected in the future, i don't see there is any point in whole--being cloning.
Many people consider this technology a promising one as to bring all human being to a new era in which all human reproction will be accomplished by cloning.Thus scientists in some countries have already started their great plan to clone human.But let's think, what is the practical value in doing so?You may tell me that it can bring hope for those couples unable to have children because they might choose to have a of one of them rather than accept the gene intrusion from a doner.But imagine,if you have a child owning the same apperance as yours or your husband's, will you accept it without any uncomfort?
Don't you think it is embarrassing?Or if this kind of human reproction is allowed,terrorists may get hold of it and reproce lots of "American Presidents".Don't you agree that these presidents might bring the world much more chaoes?Besides these terrible aspects,the cloning of whole--being may destroy the diversity of people of the globe.
再有
1． 克隆技術與遺傳育種
在農業方面，人們利用「克隆」技術培育出大量具有抗旱、抗倒伏、抗病蟲害的優質高產品種，大大提高了糧食產量。在這方面我國已邁入世界最先進的前列。
2． 克隆技術與瀕危生物保護
克隆技術對保護物種特別是珍稀、瀕危物種來講是一個福音，具有很大的應用前景。從生物學的角度看，這也是克隆技術最有價值的地方之一。
3． 克隆技術與醫學
在當代，醫生幾乎能在所有人類器官和組織上施行移植手術。但就科學技術而言，器官移植中的排斥反應仍是最為頭痛的事。排斥反應的原因是組織不配型導致相容性差。如果把「克隆人」的器官提供給「原版人」，作器官移植之用，則絕對沒有排斥反應之慮，因為二者基因相配，組織也相配。問題是，利用「克隆人」作為器官供體合不合乎人道？是否合法？經濟是否合算？
克隆技術還可用來大量繁殖有價值的基因，例如，在醫學方面，人們正是通過「克隆」技術生產出治療糖尿病的胰島素、使侏儒症患者重新長高的生長激素和能抗多種病毒感染的干撓素，等等。
㈣ 急求一篇英語辯論稿！
如何提高英語成績
一、怎樣提高閱讀?
多讀,精泛結合,
把握讀的方法,使用瀏覽,查讀,尋讀,對不同文體採用不同的方法,就好比駕駛員開車要用不同的速度一樣,
學會揣詞,分析長句\難句,抓住句子主幹或關鍵詞,善於找主題句,知道常見的問題怎麼出:
這樣就能在有限時間積累並運用。
3.同義詞完形、單選中都有，其實都在考具體上下文語境，既然你的 「語感和理解能力勉強還可以」，那就充分發揮你的語感，你能否試試不看完形的選項能直接作對8－10空呢？我較我的學生訓練時，就是不給選項，開始有的只能填對1－2空，後來慢慢地增加到5－10 甚至更多，完形還要特別注意下文提示上文的地方，有的要到下文10幾行後采提示，作後一定要復核一遍。這樣訓練50篇左右就可以將它提高到20分以上哦！^_^
4.書面表達建議背50篇範文,不是新概念3,而是學生優秀作文,在仔細研究每中文體的寫法和每一篇的優秀句子.看一看我怎麼寫,人家有怎麼寫......再自己堅持每周寫一篇.
5.單選最好作一本錯題本:把每次作業及考試的易錯題歸類整理,並表明出錯原因,以便下次避免在犯同樣錯誤.
二、怎樣學習詞彙
詞彙是語言的基本組成成分，要培養語言交際技能，就必須掌握一定的詞彙量。同時，詞彙是英語學習的基礎，詞彙量的多少是衡量英語水平高低最基本的標准之一。因此，詞彙學習在語言教學中始終佔有舉足輕重的地位。
怎樣才能快速提高英語成績
首先，要學好英語，最關鍵的是要有興趣。俗話說：興趣是最好的老師。教我們英語的是一位 年輕的老師，他講課很風趣，還總是讓我們自己上台講課，演小品。生動的英語教學，讓我對英語產生了濃厚的興趣。光有興趣還不行，我們還得知道如何去學。
對很多同學來說背單詞無疑是件很痛苦的事了。我在背單詞時，不是按照單詞書上的一個一個背下來，這樣很容易讓人產生厭倦心理，而且很容易忘。我是在每一頁抽幾個背，就是很隨機的。在平時，我們可以製作一些小卡片，把很難記的寫在上面，一有空就那出來看一下，或者可以在床頭放一些卡片，每天睡覺前看幾眼。更有效的就是在睡前和寢室的同學進行猜字競賽。每次大家互相把當天學的單詞猜一遍，這樣就記的牢了。當然背單詞最重要的是要不間斷的進行溫習。
三、怎樣提高口語水平？
一般來說，衡量一個人口語水平高低主要看以下幾個方面：
1．語音、語調是否正確，口齒是否清楚；
2．流利程度；
3．語法是否正確，用詞是否恰當，是否符合英語表達習慣；
4．內容是否充實，邏輯是否清楚。
這些是衡量會話能力的主要標准。針對以上標准，採取相應的訓練方法，大致可分作兩個階段。
第一階段：准備階段，主要是進行模仿。背誦。復述練習。目的是訓練正確的語音。語調。提高流利程度，培養英語語感。同時，通過各種方式，如閱讀。做練習題，聽英語磁帶，看英語錄像和電影等，來擴大詞彙量。掌握英語的習慣表達方式，擴大知識面和訓練英語邏輯思維能力，准備會話前，要對常用的詞(組)、短語等熟練掌握，「熟練」是與人會話的前提，只有熟練，在會話時才能流利。熟練的標准就是要達到不假思索地脫口而出。
第二階段：實踐階段，主要進行大量的會話練習，與他人對話、討論，基礎好的可練習口譯，自己講英語故事等等。
㈤ 用英語寫一篇英語辯論賽的歡迎稿
克隆利弊爭論比較大的就是倫理問題
作為正方可以迴避倫理問題，抓住治療科研方面突破，攻擊對方弱點，讓其無還手之機。
To clone or not to clone, is that the question?
Advanced technology has already pushed human being to edges,such as the proction of weapons of mass destruction,the destruction of Ozone by Freon ,and the application of clone.The heated deabte over whether cloning technique should be used in human reproc--
tion must be considered as a serious issue.
Clone, to a certain degree, is beneficial to mankind.Such disease as Parkinsons will possiblly be cured in the future in the hope of further applying of clone.However,the abuse of this technology will bring human being unthinkable destruction.
Since the declaration of the death of Dolly,we are more conscious of the inefficient procere of clone.Acorrding to "Dolly's false legacy",the incidence of death among fetuses and offspring proced by cloning is much higher than it is through natural reproction--roughly 10 times as high as normal before birth and 3 times as high after birth.And even you may argue that this technology will be perfected in the future, i don't see there is any point in whole--being cloning.
Many people consider this technology a promising one as to bring all human being to a new era in which all human reproction will be accomplished by cloning.Thus scientists in some countries have already started their great plan to clone human.But let's think, what is the practical value in doing so?You may tell me that it can bring hope for those couples unable to have children because they might choose to have a of one of them rather than accept the gene intrusion from a doner.But imagine,if you have a child owning the same apperance as yours or your husband's, will you accept it without any uncomfort?
Don't you think it is embarrassing?Or if this kind of human reproction is allowed,terrorists may get hold of it and reproce lots of "American Presidents".Don't you agree that these presidents might bring the world much more chaoes?Besides these terrible aspects,the cloning of whole--being may destroy the diversity of people of the globe.
㈥ 英語辯論發言稿
Almost everybody assumes that Chinese religion is polytheist in nature. My question is: where did this sort of religion come from? How did it originate? As for the origin of religion in general, there have been two opposite theoretical explanations. The first is a quite prevailing one, as represented by such giant thinkers as Herbert Spencer, Burnet Taylor, George Frazer, etc. According to them, religions have been developed evolutionally in a progressive way, i.e., from the pre-or/and simi-religions in the pre-historical time, to the polytheism in most ancient civilizations, and lastly, to the monotheism only in Judaism, Christianity and Islamism. On the other side, William Schmidt and others represent an opposite theory. They attempted to prove that the developing line of religion is not progressive, but degenerate from a primary monotheism in the process of cultural diffusion to varieties of polytheism, and even lower forms of superstition.
A key point of their disagreement concerns the objects of religious worship. According to the progressive theory, the low, manifold and complex worship objects converged upon the simple, unified and higher ones, and finally, upon the ultimate reality pointing to a unique, supreme God. The degenerate theory assumed an opposite direction of divergence, starting with the supreme God and ending with the lowest sort of religions.
The debate between the two theories has taken place since the second half of the 19th century. Due to the limit of knowledge and interest, both sides could hardly take account of Chinese religion in the ancient time. Western scholars took it for granted that the Chinese religion is a form of polytheism, and originated from totem worship, animism and magic rituals, as they had seen in other primitive cultures.
Since this century many new discoveries and interpretations have been made in the fields of archaeology, anthropology, sociology, history, linguistics and cross-cultural studies. These enable us to rethink the origin and development of the Chinese religion in the context of the unsolved debate between progressive and degenerate theories.
The chronology of the Chinese religion can be divided into 3 stages: the primary religion in the pre-historical time, the primary system of polytheism in the Shang and Chou Dynasties, and the proliferated forms of polytheism from Chin Dynasty to the present time. We know little about the primary religion and focus ourselves on the religion in the Shang and Chou Dynasties.
According to my analysis, the polytheistic system in that time manifested a hierarchy of objects of worship, from the highest, supreme God, to the ancestral spirits, and then to the natural spirits and the lowest spirits of ordinary life.
Based on the exegesis of oracle bone inscriptions in the Shang time and classics in the pre-Chin time, my paper is intended to prove the thesis that it is unlikely that the polytheism in the Shang and Chou time resulted from a converging progress from more primitive and lower worships. That religious system was constructed and functioned downwards from above, rather than upwards from below.
I dare to present arguments for the above thesis as follows.
I. It is unlikely that the supreme God was proced by Shang people as a result of the convergence from their images of ancestral spirits.
1) The Shang people didn』t have the idea that God had a blood relationship with their ancestors. Their relationship was rather conceived as the host-guest relation.
2) God did not communicate with people directly, but only indirectly through the mediation of their ancestors.
3) God was conceived as the source of life and the originator of mankind, yet without sexual behavior and natural birth. This perplexity led to the myth of the sympathetic birth in almost all ancient societies.
4) God was not proced as a result of the abstraction from the total image of their ancestors. This can be shown by the ritual order, in which the rites for the God was strictly distinguished from, and higher than the rites for the totality of ancestors.
II. It is unlikely that the God was proced as a result of a converging development from natural spirits.
1) Natural spirits were the personal images of the minister-ancestors. It is illogical to conceive them as the image of God who is higher than the king-ancestors.
2) The God named as Ti in the Shang time, and was neither the God of heaven, nor a natural God. He was identical with the Heaven (Tian) only later in the Chou time.
3) The shift from Ti to Tian can be explained in terms of moralization from a humanistic perspective, but also in terms of a degeneration of religious faith and feeling from a theological (not necessarily Christian) perspective. The tendency of degeneration continued in and after the pre-Chin time and led to a naturalistic attitude towards Heaven.
III. Ancestral spirits were not worshiped as a result of the converging development of animism and totem.
1) Ancestral spirits were dead persons with both spirit and body. Therefore no difference between spirit and ghost existed in that time. Those personal spirits and ghosts are not the same as souls in the animism that Taylor proposed.
2) Ancestral spirits were not developed from totem worship. According to my own interpretation, a totem is a symbol used for the classification of blood ties and the identity of a clan. When the totem symbols were changed into name ring the time of the beginning of a primitive language, especially in the process of the origin of the pictorial language of the chinese, the symbolized animals were confused with the first ancestor of the clan.
3) The transformation from totem worship to ancestral worship can be understood better as the mythical origin, caused by a certain 「linguistic disease」 (in the words of Max Müller). .
VI. The divination in the Shang and Chou time cannot be interpreted by Frazer』s theory of magic in terms of shamanism.
1) Divination was used as a necessary means to communicate with the God after a religious reform in the pre-historical time, which broke the Heaven-Earth link.
2) The diviner (wu) is not the same as a magician. The role assigned to the wu was to serve as mediator in communication. He was only able to pass the divine prediction without any power to change it, much less affect or even control God by his magic power.
3) The wu has to show the great piety and respect for the God in order to receive the divine information. Divination was practiced as a part and an effect of the divine worship, and cannot be prior to the notion of an omniscient God.
參考資料：http://162.105.161.68/forum/viewtopic.php?t=60
㈦ 寫一篇英語辯論稿，70詞左右就行了 幫幫忙，急！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！
正方： of your favorite items is a personal hobbies, the performance of an indivial seeking to enhance the love of life, a strong-minded people. At the same time, collection of items is likely to become in a few years later, precious relics and historical value.
反方：Collection of items too loving not only a waste of money, but also affect the normal life and quality of life. There was even items for collection at your favorite daughter. This is the favorite for the obsession with change is absolutely undesirable.
㈧ 急需一篇英語辯論稿
是寫環保的么？如果是，可以參考我給你寫的。
以下這些可以給你作為立論的。
在環境保護已經成為全球最熱門話題的今天，不論是國家政府，還是企業以及個人，都已經把環保事業重視起來。然而我們不得不承認，社會和生活是很現實的，沒有足夠的資金，有太多的事業都很難有效的進行，不幸的是，這其中也包括環保。環保治污是一項非常需要高新技術以及高新人才的事業，如果沒有這些，不但治污的效果達不到，而且可能會在治理一項污染的過程中產生另一項污染。這樣的話，我們為環保所付出的努力就變得毫無意義了。而對於政府及企業來說，如果想要引進高新技術及人才，資金是必不可少的。因此只有有了錢，我們才能更好的進行環保事業，從而使我們的環境變得更好。
Nowadays, environmental protection has become the hotest topic all around the globe, to which not only the governments, but also enterprises and indivials have payed their great attention. However, we have to admit that we are living in a realistic society, and there are too many goals that we're not able to achieve effectively without enough funds, in which, unfortunately, environmental protection is included. Environmental protection & pullution controlling is an undertaking with high requirements for high-tech and top talents. Without these supports, the proccess of one pollution control may not only be effectiveless, but also become the cause of another pollution. In this case, the efforts we have taken for environmental protection would become senseless. Moreover, it's essential to have enough money for govenments and enterprises to bring in hi-technologies and top talents. As a result, it's necessary to have enough money in order to carry out the undertakings of environmental protection, which is, to make good changes to our environment.
以上是我手創的，就算你去大學英語辯論會也絕對站得住腳了。應該對你有用。
另外給你提供一個論據，是我國一家環保企業--中國博奇環保科技最近在東證（世界第二大證券交易市場）上市的成功案例，它從側面反映了擁有雄厚的財力對於推行環保事業有多麼重要。以下是相關新聞資料
http://china.nikkei.co.jp/china/news/intv/intv200710220120.html
如果需要修改或擴充上面的那段立論。
㈨ 英語辯論稿
Should Yuanmingyuan Be Built?
Yuanmingyuan, Garden of all gardens, was burnt down in 1860. Recently my classmates had a discussion about whether it should be rebuilt or not.
Some of them strongly support the idea of rebuilding with various persuasive reasons. To reconstruct it, we can be thoroughly intoxicated in its vast magnificence as well as fully present the splendor of Chinese culture. And definitely, it will become an inviting landscape to attract an increasing number of visitors. Or even if we merely partly rebuild it, people who come here will still deeply remember the humiliation of the past when compared it to the ruins beside it.
While others are still strongly against it, thinking it is fairly reasonable to leave it as what it was to warn every visitors not to forget the past. Besides, other cultural relics such as the Palace Museum and the Summer Palace have already fulfilled the task of illustrating Chinese culture, so it is not necessary to rebuild it. And taken the environment into consideration, the rebuilding project is really detrimental to the eco-system.